search results

(...) ently, in my app, this only works if the user has editing rights for this instance. But I don't actually want that the users have editing rights on all instances and do not want to create complicated rules , that then unlock the overall rights, but immediately revoke the rights for certain fields. In the field matrix I can only set the attachements checkbox to visible or invisible. Other formular field (...)

(...) ers new form (parent), to that form, he needs to register additional forms (children). It's 2 level tree childrens are leafs, they can't be parents. On those children forms, there are validation rules , which depends on data from the parent form, and a path [Validate] which checks for required fields. To make sure that children forms are filled properly - when I'm moving the parent form to further (...)

(...) are situations, where we like to only allow certain content types, e.g. pdf's, that are a subset of the globally allowed attachments. Currently, the only way to restrict is the usage of validation rules . For usability reasons, it would be much better, to be able to restrict the allowed document types. With a little bit of javascript it is possible to set the accept attribute of the input field. (...)

(...) Hello, In many places we are able to create Process Business Rule from rule typed in a field (visibility, required, and many others). Similarly with form rules . I have a case, where i need to use same mail that is already being used, but to different people. (exactly 12 contents). Right now it requires manual creation of templates by copy-pasting them from action into e-mail template. Could we (...)

(...) Hello, for AND's and OR's inside business rules we have ability to change layout from horizontal to vertical, which helps to keep it nice and tidy. Few times i've used concat, which got really long - see attachment. Maybe we could get vertical layout for concat? :)

(...) Hello there :) I have yet another problem, regarding the form validation. I've attached the rules that I've applied. What I want to do is I want to block the occurence of choosing current day while it's after 9.00 A.M. Otherwise If the day is than Today() then the result is TRUE, which means, you are able to go further. Best Regards, Igor

(...) Hi, I propose to reduce the documentation section by half, and enlarge the bottom sections on rules . Regards.

(...) ow ok once you double click it. (picture 1) 2. I have another ForEach and inside I made a business rule that uses, again, info from column collection and it is working, but when I go to all business rules and open it i will see something similar with the first example. (picture 2) The actions work, but they might look broken the first time you see them. Is this normal? Best regards!

(...) art, Reset are enough). Are these requirements feasible to be done in WEBCON? I know, in WEBCON: • There are an HTML form fields, even supporting some JavaScript functions. • There are a Form rules with JavaScript mode But, where to put what (JS, HTML, CSS) and how to combine/address/relate parts to functional stopwatches?

(...) ect, the operation is invalid. ------------------------------------------------------- Call path ------------------------------------------------------- w WebCon.WorkFlow.BusinessLogic.Businessrules .Nodes.RuleNode.AddParameter(IBusinessRuleNode node, Int32 brpId) w WebCon.WorkFlow.Studio.Forms.Businessrules .BasicDesigner.Placeholder.AddBusinessRuleValueNodeCommandMethod(Object obj) w Sys (...)

(...) eover a CSS low-code editor would be nice to build those styles via drag & drop und autocompletion and colorpicker in all style configuration fields. Maybe with "..." like it is for form and business rules to open the rule editor. Kind Regards Sébastien

(...) Hi, it would be nice if it would be possible to define local and global configurations for regular expressions like it is possible for business and form rules . There are many regular expressions that we need very often and it would be nice having them as templates for the expressions and the error message. The way to create a global field is known and used too but we don't want global fields ever (...)

(...) Hi, it would be nice having a third behavior function next to the two behavior functions ENABLE and DISABLE for form rules that permits the field to be edited via JS but not writeable by the user. Kind Regards Sébastien

(...) back to older months shoud be blocked. If one hast a start and end date (time) the end time should also dynamically get set that it has to be greater than the start date. Further configuration with rules would be nice too to set that the end date must be e.g. 7 days later than chosen start date. Also a max date option should be in the configuration that blocks selection of dates after the max date (...)

(...) Hi, it would be nice if one could also create new groups for global fields and automations in system settings like it is for global constants, form rules and business rules . Kind Regards Sébastien

(...) ult. The name of the AD-Group field is "testgroup" - tested with an ALERT. It would be great if passing a "person or group" field to the "group member" function would work as it does in the business rules . Could this be a bug? Or are we missing anything? Kind Regards Sébastien

(...) Hi, while we can create business rules which act similar to table valued / scalar functions, we can't pass the columns/data to them. The inner business rules are executed before the outer SQL command is executed. This comes in really handy in a lot of cases but also has it's limitation and will require creating repetitive code. I would suggest the following: Create a new "type" "SQL function" (...)

(...) Hi. we've implemented some global form rules e.g. a developer on screen mode that displays meta data of fields (instead of turning on dev tools) - a knowledge base article will follow later. Small work in progress preview teaser in the attached screenshot. ;) Right now it is necessary to add this global form rule to all main form behavior sections manually to get this loaded. It would be great (...)

(...) T API. Then, I wrote an SQL query that utilized this business rule to retrieve the data. However, when testing it, I keep encountering the following error: WebCon.WorkFlow.BusinessLogic.Businessrules .Exceptions.BusinessRuleEvaluationException: Error occurred during rule SQL Fetch contractors with debt (Id: 5834) evaluation. ---> System.Exception: Error getting data for DataSource name: Windykac (...)

(...) ployees) or external (all employees) usage. A hierarchy with three levels should be sufficient. This concept could also be applied for all other objects where groups exist as global form/business rules , data sources, connections, … Kind Regards, Sébastien