search results

(...) structure as given in screenshot 1 (attached). The screenshot shows my configuration within a little test app. When I start this action, the request body fully ignores all data regarding the item lists as given in the dump below. (Hint: The error has been forced by the web service to receive the dump.) With POSTMAN the web service operates normally but from WEBCON BPS the request body does no (...)

(...) Hello, Does anyone can help me, why in WEBCON SQL query apostrophe is replace with quotation mark? On the form, I have an attribute with value: '2339226', '2504286'. In action "Change items lists value", I used an SQL query whith this attribute, but query preview returned "2339226", "2504286". Regards

(...) Hi, I don't know when the character limit for the field multiple lines of text in item lists was added, but is it possible to change this limit? Or adding the ability to change it? The DET_LongTextX column in the database is ntext type, so is there any reason to limit the number of characters to 1000? This thread may be related - https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2366/30, and users are co (...)

(...) Hi, After updating BPS to version 2022.1.4.111, I can't see the data source columns for dictionary processes. This applies to creating filters. Fixed value lists do not have this problem. What is causing this problem or change in behavior?

(...) Hi, i have a question for this post. https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/grouping-rows-of-item-lists /235 How can I change the sorting of groups, it is set to ascending by default, can it be changed to descending?

(...) Hello again, feeling a little bit like a newbie, i have another problem with Itemlists . I am playing around building a KANBAN Board with WEBCON. Therefore i would like to move ItemList-rows between my six Itemlists (Backlog, To-Do-List, In Progress, Test, Done, Blocked). After copying the row information to the new ItemList, i would like to _delete_ the old row(s) e.g. on the "UPDATE"-Path. H (...)

(...) olumn]]] = [Choice field id] I guess there must be something wrong with SELECT VALUES as this probably retrieves all the row values. However, in a business rule the functions to iterate over item lists don't exist like they do for form rules. Any tips on how to evaluate each row value in a business rule and perform an action based on the result? Thanks for your help.

(...) as decided that 'Choice fields' always require a GUID#Name to be populated. (Without this format I get an error and the subworkflow does not run). Now I have some Choice fields that use Fixed values lists in Webcon and I need to concatenate the GUID and names in SQL - but I need to know where the Fixed values lists are stored so I can do a join. Thanks in advance for your support.

(...) sing data tables. You can find more inspirations here: https://docs.aspose.com/words/net/template-syntax/ Feature requests for this new / updated action would be: - Accessing all fields, item lists and data rows/column from the template - Joining multiple documents - Adding watermark - Generation of table of content Best regards, Daniel

(...) row so the next document can be scanned. Unfortunately the focus stays at the first row all the time so the scanned value will go there. There is a SET FOCUS function but it is not working with item lists . Therefore I think I need something similar in order to set the focus on last row of the item list. Any help much apperciated! Thank in advance. Wojtek

(...) or more people then filter is not working because is more than One ... so ... I dropped that Idea because Item list is more readable than dropdown list ... And now I stopped on depending Item lists ... :/

(...) Hello everyone, in our main application, we need to import address lists from clients. For some time now, we have been hitting the limit of 1000 rows. I would like to suggest reviewing the current server performance to determine if it is now feasible to increase this limit to 2001 (header + 2000 rows) or, ideally, to 2501. This adjustment would significantly ease our workload, as we currently (...)