Michal Rykiert

We'll take this case under review to ensure the consistency of behavior throughout the system.

Hi Peter, archiving mechanisms were by design built this way to make them straightforward to use and simple to maintain in the product. At this point, we do not plan to extend their capabilities. On the other hand, since we can create multiple databases for processes (keep in mind we can store metad

Well, I think this may be the first time someone complained about a WEBCON representative reacting too quickly to the request :).

I think your understanding is correct and I do not negate the advantages of PWA that you listed. However, since WEBCON is already available on desktop and via mobile (through the web and native apps), and given our observations of how our clients use it and what they request, we cannot justify exten

Hi Dominik, we're currently working on a major revamp of the system's UI and UX. We're including your request into the analysis related to the revamp. FYI: we've had several similar requests to yours submitted by others, so your request is well-timed :). Please note the revamp will affect almost a

Hi Razvan, the desktop interface is fully scalable and can be easily accessed via mobile device without a need for a native app (although my personal preference is to use our apps since they are meant to provide UX consistent to the operating system, i.e. Android, iOS). One thing that you mentioned

Hi Katarzyna, could you please outline the business scenario for the feature you're requesting? That would help us analyze it properly and provide you with a feedback.

Since the solution has been provided I'm closing the thread.

Hi Daniel, we'll look into the feasibility of including such functionality into the system. I'm changing the status to "under review".

Hi Daniel, we understand your point. At the same time, it's not a trivial change from the system's architecture perspective. Therefore, we'll give it some time to see if there's more voices supporting your idea before we make a decision what to do next.

Raluca, it's a good idea, however it would require a major redesign. At this point, given the current interest in the requested feature, it's difficult to justify the cost of such modifications. We may re-visit this request in the future though.

Since the solution has been provided, I'm changing the status to closed. However, be aware that in parallel we'll still evaluate a possibility of making it easier to achieve the desired result.

We like the idea, we need to evaluate it against universal application. I'm changing the status to "under review".

We've included your request into the backlog. I'm changing the status accordingly.

Hi Daniel, such option exist within the Form Rules. With that said, we've put your feature request into the backlog. I'm changing the status accordingly.

We're reviewing the request against the overall development plans. I'm changing the status to "under review".

I'm changing the status to "under review" as per point 6 and 7.

Hi Daniel, agreed! We'll change the system behavior as you suggested. Stay tuned for more details.

Hi Maksymilian, we'll do it :). Stay tuned for more details!

Hi Karol, I'm happy to report that the functionality you requested will be implemented in the system. Stay tuned for more details :).