Daniel Krüger (DCCS)

Hi Łukasz, I’m wondering whether it would be better to create a new workflow instance every 6 hours instead of refreshing the existing one. Whenever a timer is executes, you create a new version which may cause problems before long. I haven’t verified whether the maximum number of version has

Hi Franek, that’s a good idea. I used it myself in a report with an URL filter to filter a multi value choose field, but I didn’t make the connection. I also used the same approach until I realized that there’s a more readable way to. Instead of testing all cases middle, start, end, single va

Hi, I'm currently trying to figure out a way to filter a Custom data source with an "dynamic" filter. Here's a rough overview: #Custom data source I've created an SDK of type data source which prepares the data #Filter I have a filter value which is dynamic for a given workflow instanc

Hi, if we have a process relation the mail for such a workflow will be the "primary" application. If we want to change this "primary" application, we currently need to: - Remove all presentation elements in the target application - Delete the relation in the target application - Move the proc

Hi Adrian, from a pure technical point of view this would be possible. The WFD_description stores all information for each comment in a JSON object. Extending this object with two new properties "Step Id", "Step Label" wouldn't be a issue. It would also be possible to migrate the existing com

Hi Phil, there's no simple solution for this. I played around with it in 2021. Maybe this would be a good starting point for you: https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2021/focus-error-field#set-focus-on-validate-form-action-field It's likely, that the logic doesn't work any more because the underly

Hi Łukasz, the maximum number of rows I had was about 1500. Which is way less than your 20.000. The first think I would do is to hide the form field in the field matrix and use a data table instead, if necessary. Otherwise rendering the form will take forever. In addition to this you could

Hi, it would be an improvement, if we would have additional column to put a documentation why a specific field was mapped to an ExtensionAttribute. It would be even better, if we would have some kind of "Usages" tab, to locate where a specific extension attribute is used but this would be way

Hi Franek, Form rules are JavaScript code which is executed in the browser. Since action are executed on the server without a browser, they are never executed. Best regards, Daniel

Hi, it would be great, if the comment (WFD_Description) would be extended with step name in which the comment has been added. Maybe the information could be stored in the format: STPID#DefaultLabel$$DE$$Translated Label" This would allow us to select the correct label if we are parsing the

Hi Arthuzad, I' m not sure that I understand your question. The Timer has two operation modes, one which executes just an action, for example sending out reminders. The other one executes a path. https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2026R1/Studio/Workflow/Step/Actions/Action_Timer/#2-operation-mod

Hi Adndrosh, hi Tomasz you mentioned something what I actively forgot about the FormFieldExtensions. These are, from my experience, really fragile in terms of packages and the SDK Tools. Especially if you are a partner and working with different WEBCON versions they are a pain. At least this is

Hi Androsh, there are two options: 1. Form field extensions This will allow you to provide a custom UI representation and logic for a form field. This uses a form field as a "backend" and you can create the UI using React and add server side logic. There are some field types which can not be

Hi Androsh, this is a technical limitation of WEBCON. Most of the available actions are executed on server side level and will require that the instance has already been saved to WEBCON. In addition, these are very likely to be available in edit mode only. There are a few exception when

Hi, we can configure multi line fields to allow pasting images in rich text mode. While I don't like it from a technical perspective the users like it. My issue with the current solution is, that the users can copy images from websites and the browsers copy the HTML instead of the image. This is

Hi, we noticed that the Field.Displayname has now the translated value of the current user. Until 2025 this line logged always the Designer Studio name. as of 2026 it is the translated value for the executing user. logger.Log($"Adding sql field'{sqlField.DisplayName}' as placeholder"); Thi

Hi, if there's only a single view, the view selection can be hidden. It hints that there are more views, while there are none. This is confusing. In addition, you don't need to provide a name /translation for the view which, in these cases, are the same as the title of the report. Best regard

Hi everyone, we received again the request to add an outgoing mail as an attachment. I know that we are not alone with it and the current workaround is, that the mail is also send to a mailbox which is watched by the HotMailBoxes functionality. Having a configuration option on the "Send cust

Hi Androsh, I will briefly answer the questions. # Is it possible to create printouts (printable documents / reports) that use values from form fields (e.g., Date from, Date to, Choice fields, Text fields) and generate a printable confirmation for the user? Yes, you can generate Word document

Hi Michał, if you restore only the content and attachment database you will have to: - Ensure that the accounts have access to the database. Depending on how WEBCON connects, this will be the App Pool and Workflow Service or the SQL user. - Run the Update/Installation option again, this will