(...) DRY) It would be great to have a 'Promote to Global Scope' button on Business Rules, Constants, Automations, Action Templates etc, so we could just move those to a scope, which is available for all Processes (unfortunately not in an application, but whole system, something like Application Scope sounds tempting, but we don't have this one to choose). I get that some of those might need some kind of re (...)
(...) an object:" would be the best possible solution. For example, we are using a data source that is connected to our project management system since these projects are used as a basis for some of our Processes . And being able to click on a selected project and look it up in the original system would make navigation a lot easier than having to search for the project in the system. I know that there a pa (...)
(...) I haven't come up with a good way how to solve this. These are the options I thought about: - Modify the privileges in the database directly - Change the field field matrix to read only for all Processes in the application - Create a path enable quick path and reassign the tasks to service user. - Unassign the licenses from the users I want to refrain modifying the database directly and editing (...)
(...) Hi, I had a case where a customer wanted to "freeze" the current state of the Processes in an application. "Freeze" in this context means, that it should not be possible, to trigger any path transitions, save the instance or add new attachments. While this isn't a common situation, it may come in handy to have a support way to reach this , which doesn't require modifying the process: - Migrating fr (...)
(...) some business scenarios, it is necessary to allow selection of users who are no longer active (e.g., for historical reference, archival workflows, former approvers, or when completing data in legacy Processes ). Please consider adding a new option (checkbox) in the Advanced configuration of the “Person or group” form field [Include inactive accounts]. When selected, the field's data source should also (...)
(...) re user CALs than we had installed. We had 500 CALs, but we used 511 CALs – how is that possible? Why doesn’t Webcon show any message that too many licenses are being used? Webcon works fine, and all Processes run without issues. Webcon 2025, perpetual license
(...) isibility of non-standard configuration Broken inheritance represents an intentional deviation from inherited behavior. A red step name makes such deviations instantly visible, especially in complex Processes . 3. Reduced risk of configuration errors Visual indication helps detect unintentionally broken inheritance early, lowering the risk of hidden misconfigurations and unexpected runtime behavior. (...)
(...) It would be great to be able to create or use a custom source on report. The problem arises every time we want to visualize data from different Processes on a single chart. In such cases, the default sources are limited to system data only. It is not possible to physically connect logically related data. Our case is a little more complex. We have long-term tasks, connected hierarchically, whose (...)
(...) Hi Community, In most Processes in my BPS, access to the application is granted to the AD group 'Domain Users'. I currently need to restrict access rights for three users in this group. Is it possible to do this without creating a new group?
(...) e possible to set this documentation even for extension attributes which are not mapped. This is especially useful for partners. They can tell the customers which extension attributes are used by the Processes they build. Best regards, Daniel
(...) ultiple Data Sources or embedding logic elsewhere. Disadvantages: - Redundancy: The same underlying query or lookup often needs to be duplicated for each variation. - Tightly coupled to specific Processes : A Data Source is hardwired to a specific e.g. form field, Item List, or workflow use case. - Lack of flexibility: Dynamic adaptation to different inputs or contexts is cumbersome or impossible with (...)
(...) Hi, right now configurations are process specific and contain amongst others business rules, form rules, constants, automations. If multiple Processes of the same app or even other apps need one of those there is the possibility to create a global equivalent in system settings. Unfortunatelly global objects have no app binding functionality as data sources have. Some global constants, business or for (...)
(...) d be really nice if it would be possible to add a "data source table widget" to a dashboard that can just be filled with data of a data source instead of only "report data tables" with information of Processes . The data source should have the same sort and filter possibilities in the dashboard as in Processes . There is so much data in data sources we'd like to visualize, search, filter, ... on a dashboa (...)
(...) ance. Nothing happened. I also can't see this timer in Reports > Timer operations activity analysis. Do you know why? Perhaps I have to restart my workflow service? I have some timers on another Processes that work perfectly. However, I was never able to test them efficiently by reducing the interval to a very short period of time and wait for the actions. Would be grateful for your help, Łukasz J (...)
(...) untime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw() w System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task) w WebCon.WorkFlow.Studio.Logic.Managers.Processes Manager.d__10.MoveNext() --- Koniec śladu stosu z poprzedniej lokalizacji, w której wystąpił wyjątek --- w System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw() w System.Runtime.Comp (...)
(...) Hi, today, saving Processes , apps, and artifacts in the Studio lacks a structured way to document what changed and why. This creates several limitations: - Low transparency: Changes are saved without clear intent or context. - Weak traceability: No consistent link between a change and a requirement, bug, or external ticket (e.g., Jira). - Inconsistent documentation: Teams rely on manual conventions (...)
(...) step/assigning to other user that user task should appear as flagged) Reason for this request: As higher in hierarchy a manager is, as more probable that he will have tasks from many applications / Processes . By given them the task already flagged will allow them to go in My Tasks directly from the portal main page, and focus first on those ones that are flagged, rather to have them reading all and decid (...)
(...) Hi, I've suffixed Processes that contain a workflow with a cyclical on start global action with " [JOB]". To get an overview of all process planed as a job I've created a dictionary report in a dashboard and want to filter the column "Process Name" with a default filter. Now I have 3 different behaviors: - Using "[JOB]" returns all Processes in the list without any filtering > This seems to be a bug (...)
(...) Hi everyone, In my scenario, the user uploads an Excel file with multiple sheets. Each sheet has the same structure but contains different data. I need to create an SDK plugin that Processes the file and adds entries to an item list, using the sheet name as a reference. Has anyone dealt with a similar case or can suggest the best approach/methods to handle this? Best regards!
(...) e document attached. If there are more attachments, the current full text search returns the element with all its documents even if only one document matches the search term. For Records Management Processes , where we can have several dozens of documents, it is impossible to find the right document. WEBCON does store attachments as relations, therefore it is technically possible to submit a query to S (...)