User Voice
We currently have 3 options for item list initialization: - On Starting steps - On Every step but not finish steps - None I'd like to propose a new one here - On Demand. This one would allow us to define how the item list should be initialized, but it will initialize only when called with INITIALIZE function in form rules OR by pressing the Initialize button on the form. In theory we can fill in the initialization, then set action mode to No initalization, and mark the 'Show initializ (...)
I would like to be able to add a hyperlink to a choice field and make the selected value clickable. Just selecting a column in the data source which provides the link would be sufficient, however building it through an expression like the "Link to a form for adding an object:" would be the best possible solution. For example, we are using a data source that is connected to our project management system since these projects are used as a basis for some of our processes. And being able to clic (...)
The possibility to add group owners made the administration of groups much easier. But in environments with a lot of groups, changing the ownership can be a pain without using some type of automation I would really appreciate, if we could use BPS- and AD-Groups as group owners.
Hi, At first the challenge - I'm currently reaching max # of Choose fields in my process. Trying to avoid future troubles I'm adding new workflows in a new process, and this leads to massive amount of duplicates of: business rules, constants, automations (fortunately not form rules). Let's say i have a business rule which contains some users call it 'Manager Role' - inside of the app, there are many manager roles, but lets make it simple. It's used on few buttons around the process to mak (...)
Hi, Add to the list of items - single line of text as a hyperlink, as in the case of the single line of text attribute. For creating documentation with a larger number of links and references, it would certainly be useful to be able to refer to specific places for specific things.
Hi, audit topic regarding reading the form and downloading the attachment 1. Save information about who read the form after reading it - this is not about displaying the task because it is available 2. Who downloaded the attachment from the form The ability to enable, for example, specific processes that are subject to the audit process.
In addition to the date, user and version, it would be helpful to also display the size of an attachment.
Hi, Is there a chance to add alternative way of filtering data on reports based on text fields rather than filtering specific values? It's quicker for user to enter directly search phrase rather than choosing from list, even filtered values (sometimes user have to check multiple options that meet search phrase). Additionally it skips one sql query used for generating list of values in filter. It could be defined on report parameters or available to switch by the user.
In the past, we had the requirement to force the user to add exactly one document. Of course, this can be done with validation rules. However, it would be perfect, if after reaching the maximum amount of attachments, the buttons to add new documents would be disabled. Just how it is already implemented for a dictionary template element.
Could you please extend the BPS group with an optional email field? Reason: By having an email field for the BPS group, it would be possible to send the email to a group mail box, rather than to every user.
hi, It would be useful to know at what stage the comment was added. The name of the step could appear next to the user name and date in the comment header. Regards.
Hi, it would be great if the link of an entry in a report column could be set to a link to the instance of the displayed object in the form field value. This option only exists right now if the choice field is related to a BPS internal view but not for choice fields with a data source of type dictionary or user/group. The form field value link of a dictionary entry could lead to the dictionary's entry and a link to a user or group could lead to a profile page. The screenshot shows the g (...)
Hi, it would be great having an audit log or audit trail feature as e.g. Microsoft and Atlassian have it to get an easy overview of what a specific user has done. Security relevant features like last login/access timestamp to WEBCON portal, Designer Desk and Designer Studio should get saved seperately. Right now there seems to be no information available in the database when a user last used one of the modules. The audit log could also contain login events for failed logins for easier d (...)
[Benefits and business justification] - In many business processes, items are archived after a certain period to reduce the load on the production database. - However, access to historical data is often essential – e.g., in the context of audits, analysis, reporting, or trend comparisons. - Granting appropriate permissions enables precise management of archive access, aligned with real business needs. Optimization of analytical and reporting processes - Archived data is often analyzed (...)
New assignment filter: All active where I am delegated/substitute Currently, such a report is created in the SQL filter if you do not want to show the user's active tasks.
Hi everyone! What do you think about adding a customization option on the home page, e.g., to support, so that every user would immediately know where to report information related to a problem? Additionally, if it were possible to add “Useful links” on the left side of the navigation bar, I think it would be very helpful for system users.
The system looks inconsistent — we can easily change colors for group headers and tab panels, but not for the comments and attachments sections. These sections look similar to tab panels, so it would make sense to allow color changes there too.
Please verify the ability to filter by each column type in the item lists. Filtering on the header is similar to an Excel spreadsheet.
Would you be open to adding a way to archive items (like employee requests) while keeping some of the access permissions? Right now, archived items can only be accessed by people who see the whole archive. It’s possible to manually give someone read access, but that’s not very practical. Could you add an option to automatically give read access based on a field in the form during archiving or a bulk action to assign read permissions to archived items?
Would you be open to exploring the option of exporting packages with anonymized connections, so that credentials like client ID, secret, and account names are not included?
+48 12 443 13 90