I would like to be able to add people and groups to a new category that would block access to the application or the workflow itself. Ideally, permissions would be overridden. This would help me manage permissions.
I would like to be able to add people and groups to a new category that would block access to the application or the workflow itself. Ideally, permissions would be overridden. This would help me manage permissions.
Huge and the corners do not align with the center of other shapes resulting in path transitions with corners instead of straight lines.
Hi,
I suggest introducing gamification capabilities within WEBCON BPS Portal to increase user engagement, process adoption, and data quality.
Users could earn points, badges, and achievements based on their activities in the platform, such as:
* Completing workflow tasks on time
* Creating and processing workflow instances
* Maintaining high-quality data
* Participating in business processes regularly
* Reaching productivity milestones
* Supporting process improvements and optimization initiatives
Organizations could optionally use leaderboards, levels, personal progress tracking, and rewards to encourage participation and strengthen user adoption of digital processes.
Gamification would make daily interaction with WEBCON BPS more engaging, increase process compliance, and help organizations drive successful digital transformation initiatives.
Raluca has a KB article about it but built-in and maintained by WEBCOB would be great:
https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/how-can-you-digitize-processes-in-webcon-bps-and-make-them-engaging-at-the-same-time/438/4
Kind regards
Sébastien
(My idea but AI generated text)
Daniel, I've forwarded your suggestion to the devs.
Two years since this was forwarded to the devs, and still nothing? 🤔
Hi,
we have dictionaries containing a multiline text field containing base64 image strings. Those strings are needed to display the image in reports or picker dialogs.
Using the Excel export button in the portal leads to this error:
"msg: An unhandled exception has occurred while executing the request. | ... | href: | ex: Aspose.Cells.CellsException: You want to put a string longer than 32K to Cell F4. MS Excel only allows to put a string shorter than 32K to a Cell."
This is why I suggest to add import/export not only for Excel but also for JSON format.
Kind regards
Sébastien
We're reviewing the situation as it's a bit more intricate than you described. We'll update this tread whenever a decision is reached.
Hi Michał
We are still waiting for a solution to an issue that should be straightforward to implement.
From the SQL perspective, the report displayed on the dashboard has the same configuration as a regular report. The view configuration is also identical. From the front-end perspective, the situation should be clear, as dashboard filtering operates on data sources rather than on individual reports. Therefore, it is difficult to understand how such a discrepancy in behavior could have been introduced between two identically functioning solutions.
I hope this issue can be resolved in the near future, as an increasing number of users are beginning to raise complaints in this area.
We’re also waiting for this feature in our company. The current solution is costly and not very efficient.
Hi,
in the configuration of a report it is possible to have a dropdown of steps of the workflow in the advanced filters section. But those addtional filters can be deselected from users. That's why I suggest to have the same functionality with dropdowns with all values also in default filters instead of limited matching criteria and a static value.
Indicating a step id here breaks the report after import to other environments because the step id remains the one from DEV.
This is not only for the step attribute. You can enhance all attributes representing a form field.
Kinrd regards
Sébastien
In our company, we have a process where we fill out project request forms. The data from these forms is later used to create a PowerPoint presentation, which is presented to higher management.
A feature that allows exporting the form directly to a PPTX file (similar to the existing DOCX export) would be very useful.
Please add:
1. New response type "Multipart"
Support multipart HTTP responses in the "Invoke REST Web Service" action, not only multipart request bodies.
2. Add header and response code/body mapping for response type "Binary"
HTTP headers are independent from the body type and should be accessible for mapping even when the response body is handled as binary stream / attachment.
Typical use cases:
* file download + metadata headers
* OCR/AI APIs returning metadata in headers
* presigned URLs
* correlation IDs
* filename/content-disposition handling
3. Add new response type "Text" / "Raw"
Currently the action supports only:
* Binary
* JSON
A plain text / raw response mode is missing.
This causes problems with APIs returning:
* CSV
* text/plain
* XML without JSON wrapping
* custom text formats
without requiring JSON deserialization.
4. Decouple response parsing from mapping capabilities
Currently:
* JSON mode enables response/header mapping
* Binary mode disables it
The response metadata (headers/status code) should always be available independently from body parsing mode.
5. Add support for content-type aware handling
Example:
* application/json => JSON parsing
* text/csv => text mode
* application/octet-stream => binary mode
Currently JSON mode appears to force Newtonsoft JSON deserialization regardless of actual response content type.
6. Allow mapping of:
* HTTP status code
* raw response body
* response headers
for all response modes.
This would significantly improve compatibility with modern REST APIs.