search results

(...) customer, using values from an Item List. Following that action, I'm using another "Generate an Excel file" action to then update the existing Excel and map it's column name cells (A1-Z1) to Business rule s containing translations for those column names, so we don't have to use our internal Item List names. That now leads to the generated - translated Excel to become corrupted, as supposedly, its inter (...)

(...) Created form rule that is triggered on Change by a float field. It checks if the sum of a certain column in an itemlist exceeds the value in the field, if so the colum should turn red. The problem is if the form rule is triggered it chan only change the color once. If we change the value again the color persists (i tested the statment with an alert if it follows the right branch) Does some (...)

(...) ime (h) – Choice field (values like: 1, 1.5, 2, etc.) Date to – DateTime field I want Date to to be automatically calculated as: Date to = Date from + Time (h) hours I tried to use a form rule , but I keep getting an error in the Date to field. Has anyone implemented a similar calculation? What is the recommended way (formula / ADD DATE / JavaScript) to achieve this? Thanks in advanc (...)

(...) printable confirmation for the user? Does WEBCON BPS have a built-in task scheduler / job scheduler (harmonogram zadań)? What are plugin packages mainly used for, considering that many business rule s and logic can already be configured using the standard rule editor (click-based configuration)? Is it possible to create custom configurations with custom objects/entities that are not standard W (...)

(...) ty: Dynamic adaptation to different inputs or contexts is cumbersome or impossible without workarounds. Proposed Improvement: Introduce parameter support for Data Sources, similar to how Business rule s allow input parameters. Parameters could include: - Filter values (e.g., a specific cost center, OU, or status) - Context values (e.g., current user, workflow field, or system variable) This wo (...)

(...) 567 AS ref, 1 AS cat, 'ESP' AS country UNION ALL SELECT 567 AS ref, 1 AS cat, 'ESP' AS country UNION ALL SELECT 567 AS ref, 3 AS cat, 'ESP' AS country Using this data source e.g. in a business rule or a user picker with this filter returns rows that would not be exected as shown in the screenshot. An example filter expression: [ref = 123] AND [ANY TRUE[ [country = 'EQU'] [country = (...)

(...) Hi, right now configurations are process specific and contain amongst others business rule s, form rule s, constants, automations. If multiple processes of the same app or even other apps need one of those there is the possibility to create a global equivalent in system settings. Unfortunatelly global objects have no app binding functionality as data sources have. Some global constants, business o (...)

(...) for a given workflow instance. Here are two examples: {COLUMN:ID#ID} in ('KHL_030','KHL_020') {COLUMN:ID#ID} in ('KHL_001','KHL_010') #"Dynamic" value Since there are no options to use business rule s or similar in a data source filter of a choose field I'm preparing the filter value on step entry. This is sufficient for this case.. #With a standard SQL data source I would use one of these opt (...)

(...) s child. It is possible to delete this automation. If there is no automation the button never gets displayed in the edit dialog in the portal. Why not? If we just want that the button executes a form rule without any automation we'd expect to see the button in the edit dialog. Same behavior for global menu buttons of the workflow. Kind regards Sébastien

(...) Hi, why are form fields available in the objects tab when configuring a validate form action but not when using the form rule editor? Can anybody explain this? Thanks and kind regards Sébastien

(...) Furthermore, in the location where I copied it, when I go to "Use" I see that it's being used in the location from which I copied it. I'm wondering if this isn't a global problem with business rule s, because when saving changes in Designer Studio, I now often get an error suggesting that a business rule with this ID already exists. I would appreciate your feedback. Regards, D. --1-- (...)

(...) It will we useful to have the possibility to mark a task as flagged, programmatically based on a business rule , at the moment of task creation. (For example If n a process a user marks a contract as Urgent, in a Helpdesk Application a user marks a ticket as Critical, etc. when sending in next step/assigning to other user that user task should appear as flagged) Reason for this request: As higher in h (...)

(...) nts? One first idea would having 3 MSSQL connections for all 3 environments. Then a MSSQL data source for each connection that gets process information, mainly the process GUID and then a business rule managing where this process GUID can be found across all environments. We have a global constant environment ID with breaked inheritance return 3 for dev, 2 for test and 1 for prod. I'm looking fo (...)

(...) ble to just copy & paste the HTML code to other environments without having to replace all occurrences of those references. Therefore I suggest to use GUIDs instead of IDs. Having global business rule s for the email template would be great too. Kind regards Sébastien

(...) ces broke it apparently, then and then it worked. I now have a multi-line advanced text field with settings and editor. I tried to add in word as rich text field control with and without Business rule / only text field value. Should I try to create the word again until it works ? Or is it just not possible to take the format of the text over into the word-file? Best regards Phil I added (...)

(...) I have a single line text field as a technical field that I set to describe specific status e.g. Approved / Denied English is set as the original language within the business rule that sets me the field along the way. I use this technical field within our dashboards but it always defaults to English no matter what I do,. The path gets triggered by a subworkflow. If I the author myself go on the (...)

(...) => would result in many workaround paths * Some cancel path do have flow-control behind, to determine the correct final step 2. Idea: I disable "comment required" in that path and create a form-rule which checks if the user is a real user or the system-user. Then checking the comment => found no way (via form-rule ) to check if the user has entered a comment or not. Could be doable via JS I guess (...)

(...) s forward slashes (/) into escaped slashes (\/) in the JSON payload, which causes the receiving API to reject the request. I’ve already tried multiple approaches: - Direct SQL query - Business rule - Populating a technical field - Storing attachment data in an item list - Building the JSON in different ways In all cases, the same escaping happens. Has anyone dealt with this before or f (...)

(...) rve item-level read permissions during archiving. This would make the archiving feature much more useful in enterprise scenarios where performance optimization must still respect existing security rule s. I think this would be valuable for many WEBCON BPS customers who need to archive large amounts of data without compromising access control. Please vote if you also need archived elements to k (...)

(...) ooks like the issue is related to XML special character escaping somewhere during the serialization of the request body — the request fails before it ever leaves WEBCON, so the endpoint itself can be rule d out. Has anyone encountered this before? Any suggestions on how to work around it — escaping the input on the WEBCON side, a known fix in a later patch, or any configuration trick — would be gr (...)