search results

(...) igure each time the wished default advanced configuration - especially for the columns configuration in the "General" tab. As a workaround we have created a "Template App" with a template process contAI ning those commonly used form fields. If we need one of them we create a relation to this template process from the edited process and do a copy paste of the form field. But this still has no inherita (...)

(...) Hi, short: Business rule text parameter string values only contAI ning digits seem to get casted to an integer value in WEBCON. long: Declaring a VARCHAR variable in SQL as a string like '001' is returned as string. If 001 is replaced by a text parameter in between single quotes its value '001' turns to 1 as integer. I would expect that a string value '001' remAI ns a string when using it as (...)

(...) lly global "objects" (business rules, form rules, constants, automations) have no app binding functionality as data sources have. Some global constants, business or form rules and automations may contAI n critical data (e.g. api tokens) that should not be useable by all devs with studio access. An option to set an object as protected and enabling an app binding to allow the usage would solve this (...)

(...) Hi, right now configurations are process specific and contAI n amongst others business rules, form rules, constants, automations. If multiple processes of the same app or even other apps need one of those there is the possibility to create a global equivalent in system settings. Unfortunatelly global objects have no app binding functionality as data sources have. Some global constants, business (...)

(...) load vs on path vs on entry vs on exit ! What is the specific order on how things trigger? Is there another documentation other than the official docs? The docs dont tell me that much about such detAI ls for example Following example We have an id and that id can be referenced in 3 other fields! Those ids are saved in a db. The field should already exist in the db or is the same a new id th (...)

(...) Hi, if we have a process relation the mAI l for such a workflow will be the "primary" application. If we want to change this "primary" application, we currently need to: - Remove all presentation elements in the target application - Delete the relation in the target application - Move the process - Recreate all presentation elements This takes a lot of time. It's quicker to fiddle around (...)

(...) ard coded values would be replaced by the field value. {COLUMN:ID#ID} in ('KHL_030','KHL_020') {COLUMN:ID#ID} in (select item from dbo.SplitToTable('KHL_030,KHL_020',','))*/ #The first approach fAI ls Field value: 'KHL_B030','KHL_B020','HL_B008' Filter: {COLUMN:ID#ID} in ({1027}) Expression preview: ID in (''KHL_B030'',''KHL_B020'',''HL_B008'') The single quotes are escaped and therefore I (...)

(...) uch data in data sources we'd like to visualize, search, filter, ... on a dashboard. As a dev imagine a WEBCON monitoring dashboard that has lots of widgets with SQL data sources that show e.g. a mAI l log, login log, process log, error log, ... Kind regards Sébastien

(...) Hi, I've created a timer with an action 'Update item list values' and 'send a custom emAI l'. I want it to refresh my item list every 6 hours. Please find attached my timer configuration (to test it I set the interval to 1 minute and added an emAI l action I mentioned above). I saved the process and wAI ted looking at my form instance. Nothing happened. I also can't see this timer in Reports > Timer (...)

(...) Hi, the AD/Entra ID attribute personalTitle (contAI ning Mr., Ms., Mrs., Dr., Prof., …) is not part of the default user synchronisation configuration. Same for employeeId, employeeNumber, ... It would be great to add those as default attributes instead of having to map them to extension attributes. Kind regards Sébastien

(...) functions in a mandatory standard filter of a report and BPS internal view. There are eg EQUAL and NOT EQUAL (with the options ID and name) but this functions would be really helpfull: (NOT) CONTAI NS (NOT) STARTS WITH (NOT) ENDS WITH (NOT) IN (for check of value collection) Kind regards Sébastien

(...) your help! Best regards, Balint Type: System.AggregateException ------------------------------------------------------- Message: A Task's exception(s) were not observed either by WAI ting on the Task or accessing its Exception property. As a result, the unobserved exception was rethrown by the finalizer thread. ------------------------------------------------------- CallStack (...)

(...) Hi, why are form fields avAI lable in the objects tab when configuring a validate form action but not when using the form rule editor? Can anybody explAI n this? Thanks and kind regards Sébastien

(...) cieżka wywołania ------------------------------------------------------- w WebCon.WorkFlow.BusinessLogic.ImportExport.Mapping.MappingList.IncludeInIndexes(MappingListRow row, Boolean addIfNotContAI ns) w WebCon.WorkFlow.BusinessLogic.ImportExport.Mapping.MappingList.AddOrUpdate(MappingListRow row) w WebCon.WorkFlow.Module.IntegrityInspection.Core.IntegrityInspection.IntegrityCheckModel.A (...)

(...) nd this functionality by introducing a filtering option that allows administrators to specify which applications or processes should be included in the migration. Of course, an “All” option should remAI n avAI lable as well. I am aware that it is possible to create an action at the process level to manually select specific WFD_IDs and include them when assigning permissions. However, since we alrea (...)

(...) don’t get displayed in standard mode. Only when switching to JS mode the form fields appear. In the form rule editor of a Validate form action the form fields appear in the Objects tab. More detAI ls here in the conversation with Jacek: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/8410 It would be more consistent and convenient if form fields would always appear in the Objects tab of a form ru (...)

(...) nventions, which quickly diverge. - Difficult audits: Reviewing history becomes time-consuming and error-prone. - Limited collaboration: Understanding someone else’s change requires digging into detAI ls instead of reading a concise summary. Proposed Solution: “Change Commit Dialog” Introduce a lightweight, optional dialog when saving changes, inspired by commit workflows in modern version co (...)

(...) hierarchy a manager is, as more probable that he will have tasks from many applications / processes. By given them the task already flagged will allow them to go in My Tasks directly from the portal mAI n page, and focus first on those ones that are flagged, rather to have them reading all and deciding when they should flag it or not for later reviews. (Of course they will still have the possibility (...)

(...) historical leaves, clicking does nothing, and there is no way to open the related request directly from the chart. I checked the underlying structure for the leave history and noticed it only contAI ns VAC_UserID, VAC_From, VAC_To, and VAC_VACTypeID. It seems to be missing a field that would link the historical entry to the workflow instance (e.g., a VAC_WFID column). Is this linkage already s (...)

(...) Hi, I've suffixed processes that contAI n a workflow with a cyclical on start global action with " [JOB]". To get an overview of all process planed as a job I've created a dictionary report in a dashboard and want to filter the column "Process Name" with a default filter. Now I have 3 different behaviors: - Using "[JOB]" returns all processes in the list without any filtering > This seems to b (...)