search results

(...) customer number field. I have a REST DataSource "REST GET CUSTOMER DATA" (..../getKundenData?customernumber=CUSTOMERNUMBER.Standard) which returns a json with all relevant customer data. I used a business rule to get the value from the REST datasource and a form rule (on value change) to set the customer name (returned from the businessrule). This is working fine. The problem is the mapping customern (...)

(...) o. Moreover a CSS low-code editor would be nice to build those styles via drag & drop und autocompletion and colorpicker in all style configuration fields. Maybe with "..." like it is for form and business rule s to open the rule editor. Kind Regards Sébastien

Hi, it would be nice if it would be possible to define local and global configurations for regular expressions like it is possible for business and form rules. There are many regular expressions that we need very often and it would be nice having them as templates for the expressions and the error message. The way to create a global field is known and used too but we don't want global fields

(...) Hi, we would like to pick a group in a form field and to use all members of this group as filter for another user picker field. Using the function GROUP MEMBERS [AD-Group Login and name] in a business rule works fine. Setting this one into an ALERT all members are returned as expected. Using 'testgroup' as string in the group picker of the function GROUP MEMBERS ['testgroup'] in a filter of a data sourc (...)

(...) Hi, while we can create business rule s which act similar to table valued / scalar functions, we can't pass the columns/data to them. The inner business rule s are executed before the outer SQL command is executed. This comes in really handy in a lot of cases but also has it's limitation and will require creating repetitive code. I would suggest the following: Create a new "type" "SQL function" Prop (...)

(...) ents in BPS based on data retrieved from another system. I already have an endpoint that returns the required data. To achieve this, I planned to use a global action (cyclical). First, I created a business rule that fetches the data using a REST API. Then, I wrote an SQL query that utilized this business rule to retrieve the data. However, when testing it, I keep encountering the following error: WebC (...)

(...) name of anohter user. Very likely not an option for WEBCONAPPS either. - The standard function "CONTENT AS BASE64 – returns an attachment in BASE64 format" returns only the value for one attachment. business rule s are executed before the written SQL command is executed so I wouldn't be able to execute this rule with dynamic data. - In theory I could use the function to populate a multi value string, but I wo (...)

(...) manually to PROD system skipping export/import functionality. But here we risk inconsistency between PROD and DEV/TEST because we must rely on human discipline. Other idea is to include "deployment" business rule on given set of actions to disable them on PROD until the feature is finally tested. Could you share some ideas / methods that might be used to handle simultaneous change requests of different siz (...)

(...) hallenge - I'm currently reaching max # of Choose fields in my process. Trying to avoid future troubles I'm adding new workflows in a new process, and this leads to massive amount of duplicates of: business rule s, constants, automations (fortunately not form rules). Let's say i have a business rule which contains some users call it 'Manager Role' - inside of the app, there are many manager roles, but lets (...)

(...) OR {WFCONCOL:444} = 'Z', 1, 0) AS Meine FROM CacheOrganizationStructure WHERE COS_BPSID = '##currentloginname##') To avoid performance issues, it would be great if we had the possibility to use a business rule to provide a filter value. Maybe the operators of the standard filter could be extended with an "Is in" option and the value with the possibility to also use a business rule instead of a fixed valu (...)

(...) e REST call itself Mapping the response into form fields (e.g. writing error_msg into a field like rest_response) What does not work: Field changes done by the Automation do not trigger OnChange business rule s (expected behaviour, since the change happens on the backend). Throwing an Automation error after the REST call only allows static error text – dynamic values (e.g. the error message returned by th (...)

(...) nerate a printable confirmation for the user? Does WEBCON BPS have a built-in task scheduler / job scheduler (harmonogram zadań)? What are plugin packages mainly used for, considering that many business rule s and logic can already be configured using the standard rule editor (click-based configuration)? Is it possible to create custom configurations with custom objects/entities that are not standard W (...)

(...) flexibility: Dynamic adaptation to different inputs or contexts is cumbersome or impossible without workarounds. Proposed Improvement: Introduce parameter support for Data Sources, similar to how business rule s allow input parameters. Parameters could include: - Filter values (e.g., a specific cost center, OU, or status) - Context values (e.g., current user, workflow field, or system variable) This wo (...)

(...) Hi, short: business rule text parameter string values only containing digits seem to get casted to an integer value in WEBCON. long: Declaring a VARCHAR variable in SQL as a string like '001' is returned as string. If 001 is replaced by a text parameter in between single quotes its value '001' turns to 1 as integer. I would expect that a string value '001' remains a string when using it as a text par (...)

(...) Hi, right now app, process and workflow's associated form type user privileges can only be set for users and/or groups. It would be great if global business rule s could be used too. A filter could be set that only global business rule s with return type „user list“ can be used. This way e.g. a business admin could manage users in a dictionary and dynamic privileges would be possible with a business rule (...)

(...) Hi, unfortunatelly global "objects" (business rule s, form rules, constants, automations) have no app binding functionality as data sources have. Some global constants, business or form rules and automations may contain critical data (e.g. api tokens) that should not be useable by all devs with studio access. An option to set an object as protected and enabling an app binding to allow the usage would solv (...)

(...) Hi, right now configurations are process specific and contain amongst others business rule s, form rules, constants, automations. If multiple processes of the same app or even other apps need one of those there is the possibility to create a global equivalent in system settings. Unfortunatelly global objects have no app binding functionality as data sources have. Some global constants, business or form ru (...)

(...) dynamic for a given workflow instance. Here are two examples: {COLUMN:ID#ID} in ('KHL_030','KHL_020') {COLUMN:ID#ID} in ('KHL_001','KHL_010') #"Dynamic" value Since there are no options to use business rule s or similar in a data source filter of a choose field I'm preparing the filter value on step entry. This is sufficient for this case.. #With a standard SQL data source I would use one of these opt (...)

(...) r Studio. Furthermore, in the location where I copied it, when I go to "Use" I see that it's being used in the location from which I copied it. I'm wondering if this isn't a global problem with business rule s, because when saving changes in Designer Studio, I now often get an error suggesting that a business rule with this ID already exists. I would appreciate your feedback. Regards, D. --1-- (...)

(...) Hi Is there any way to use business rule references when generating HTML templates? Something like {BRD:63630e35-0f8d-455e-ac6f-df8017e01c56}. I see that you can reference them in Word documents, and it works for me, e.g., {DOCPROPERTY BPSGUID_BRD:d5280b12-fad7-4dd6-9031-4b74f121c1c2_numer2}. How can I use this in HTML? And another question: how do I map arguments to a business rule already used in HTM (...)