Those children workflows are 2 step - Active/Non active. I'm having a [Validate] path (from Active to Active), which is being triggered from parent - if children workflows are not filled correctly, then parent workflow shouldn't be able to move further. Validation error is displayed with link to
Hi Jan I'm currently having almost exactly same use case, to solve it I'm using two things: 1. 'Back to the previous step' configuration on a path 'Send back with comment' - you will need only one 'Send back' path, instead of one per possible step. (As Jacek already mentioned). 2. If that 'LEGAL
Thanks Daniel, Paweł for responses, I'm still not thinking about transactions as a standard troubleshooting, so i didn't even considered it yet. Really interesting idea, unfortunately it seems that saving happens later - WITH (NOLOCK) didn't helped here. I'm not using any form rules here, althou
Hello community! I'm facing a challenge for which i don't see any solutions, maybe You will be able to find it. Use case: User registers new form (parent), to that form, he needs to register additional forms (children). It's 2 level tree childrens are leafs, they can't be parents. On thos
Hi Sławek, In case you don't want to start a workflow with each file - you need to attach them to existing ones, then you could try using API. Either executed by some external script, script executed by webcon (powershell action), or through another system. /api/data/v5.0/db/{dbid}/elements/{id
Hi Marza, Does the name column have 'searching' checkbox marked in configuration? If not, then give it a shot, but remember that when name won't be unique in data source, then it won't fill in automatically. https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2023R3/Studio/Process/Attribute/Basic/Itemlist/ChoiceC
Hi Marcin, I've configured webcon (freemium) on Azure VM's, and on local servers, where AAD was the only used authentication without any troubles. It is rather simple, and those instructions from 2021 should still apply - no breaking changes in this area if i recall correctly. There are 2 thing
Hi Adam, this JSON doesn't really looks like correct schema. I haven't used patch yet - only creating new ones, but i think it should look like that according to swagger. { "formFields": [ { "guid": "dd8a11db-e99b-4b8f-ba5a-d4e772235ca1", "svalue": "39275
Hi Sławek, there is no feature designed specially for that, but you might look up at substitutions (working on behalf mode). As administrator, you have privilege to create a substitution for every available user - simply add it, and select yourself as the person who will work on behalf of a user.
Hi, sometimes when trying to import an older .bpe package you might encounter error message like this: "The version of the import package does not match the installed WEBCON BPS version.". It's somewhat helpful, we know the reason, but we don't know the version of the package, in case we would lik
It would be great feature to have, it's always better to link to specific part of article, as we can do with docs (https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2023R3/Default) :)
Thanks Kamil for response, I've checked it on 2023.1.3.131, and it seems that local parameters are indeed available in SDK actions (attachment - automation on process level). Raluca, did I misunderstood it? :)
I'm not facing this issue yet, but I'm surprised that it's not implemented - I would assume that SDK actions can use local parameters, as any other action.
I've had similar request - defining to expand or collapse all attachments (right now i think there is default collapse when there is more than 4 files attached), but this would solve my case too.
I'm currently creating such notifications in some new integrations, or critical ones, to ensure that there will be a quick action, and fix to it. Having a global ones seems like a nice idea, but maybe with a toggle on process scope - if it should use default error handling. Stretching idea a bit
Thats for sure a good one, end users seeing 'Error' word in anything mostly pass it directly to maintainers, rather than reading the message :)
It would be great to have it, especially for parent/child workflows, where we have to create nested subqueries in calculated columns. Although, i can see how handling custom SQL, will be a major pain on Webcon side - all those cases to which there should be a filter, grouping, aggregation functio
Daniel's workaround is pretty nice, but I'm up for that feature, I've already few times tried to do it like Paweł describes, but i'm alwasy brought back to reality really quick. Off-topic I'm close to creating process automation almost every time too, navigating to specific action takes time, bu
It's a sencond user voice on this topic: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4161 I'll close previous one.
I'm on the markdown team, but tbh, any styling syntax will do :)