Michal Rykiert

We discussed your suggestion. At this point, other development ideas will be prioritized based on the level of impact. With that said, I'm glad we had some suggestions in this thread about individual browser settings that are helpful.

While we agree that there's room for improvements, at this point we'll be focusing on the development of features with higher impact and priority. With that said, we'll re-visit this thread request in the future.

In general, we recommend using the default styling options. Right now, we don't plan further enhancements in this area.

The pics in the article display correctly. The limit on the Regex validation has been vastly extended, and so far in relation to v. 2024 nobody has reached it yet :). So yes, there is progress in backlog. We're catching up with updating statuses.

We'll create a small, dedicated Community space so it's easier for you guys to find yourself at the venue. Should you like a professional photo, just ask our marketing and they'll organize a photographer on-site :)

Noted!

Hi Daniel, our team has investigated the case you descirbed. They were able to ascertain that the scenario where read only fields are not modified only happens to regular drop down fields. In such case the temporary workaround is to change the field type e.g. to autocomplete (or any other). C

I've verified before my previous answer and, as much as I hate to say it, it worked for me. Therefore, some more in-depth investigation may be needed. I recommend contacting our support (support.webcon.com) so they could help you individually.

Hi Adam, should you need an in-depth consultation regarding the SAP integration, I can direct you to a Partner that specializes in this field.

You can change the logo (displayed in the top-left part of the portal) in the settings of themes used in the system.

Daniel, I've forwarded your suggestion to the devs.

Agreed. Goes straight into the backlog.

We'll put that under review :)

Can you please elaborate why folders would be needed? Is it about a possibility of nesting folders within folders?

We're going to investigate. I'm chaning the status to "under review".

We hear you and acknowlegde that there are scenarios requiring more than 3 environments. At this point we don't plan to introduce OOTB functionality to assign a fourth environment due to the numerous implications that would have to be accomodated. With that said, we'll assist with every single ca

Agreed! Most probably we'll let users decide on the layout orientation. Your suggestion goes straight into the backlog :).

Hi Pawel, at the moment we don't plan any modifications related to the sorting. We may get back to your suggestion alongside other activities related to attachment / attachment categories.

We agree with the suggestion. For now we'll review it and see how we can proceed further.

I'm encouraging you to publish your tips & tricks in the knowledge base and with that said I'm closing the topic :).