WELCOME TO THE COMMUNITY
find what you are looking for or ask a new question

search results

for steps

(...) Why in 2025 version add (new step) button is missing from General tab and user can only add steps in Workflow designer? Is there any chance that you'll restore it in next version?

(...) t System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw() at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task) at WebCon.WorkFlow.Installer.steps .Prerequisites.SearchServer.SolrMigrateHelper.d__27.MoveNext() --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown --- at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchIn (...)

(...) Hi, Could you clarify what changes were made to the SDK licenses in WEBCON 2024 and 2025? I don’t fully understand the modifications and would like to know if I need to take any additional steps regarding the license or key to sign plugins. If I’m currently using an SDK plugin developed by our in-house development team, does that mean I might not have an SDK license? Or do I need to do something with t (...)

(...) untime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw() at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task) at WebCon.WorkFlow.Service.SolrIndexer.steps .IndexActivityStepWithoutCommit.d.MoveNext() --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown --- at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw() at (...)

(...) Hi, I am wondering if i can use an HTML field to be displayed in Reports (interface). My html field contains some info that is visible in some steps based on a business rule. And now i might need this info to be visible in reports (for filtering) and export to excel. Or do i have to create another field (single line of text)? thanks

(...) Since the latest version, exporting/importing of application start pages is not working correctly. steps to reproduce: 1) Change the start page in the existing application (dev) (e.g., move a widget) 2) Reload the application in the designer 3) Export (e.g., from dev) 4) Import (e.g., to prod) => Change is not visible in prod. In my case, it was a resizing an existing widget and moving it do (...)

(...) We will soon be using the “Public Access” feature, which allows external users to be invited to a WEBCON application step (in our case) or steps without a BPS account. So far, I’ve only found the option to customize the invitation email (see PIC-1). However, most of the people we invite are unfamiliar with WEBCON or WEBCON BPS and don’t immediately connect it to JR Rädlinger. In the invitation, we’ve a (...)

(...) I have a workflow with these steps : * Start => *Approval Task name: "upon approval" Task details: "check and approve the order" If I use "Standard Mail" in Task-Creation via Task-Configuration I get these info in the mail: "Approval - upon approval" "check and approve the order" => all correct If i use "Create Custom Mail" in the action on path i get: "Start - upon approval" "check and (...)

(...) Hi! is there a way to sort the steps in the KPI report by their order in the workflow? The current alpha-sort makes no sense, imho. (in a different workflow wie use numbers in the steps ... like 100 Start, 120 Approval,... but thats only a dirty workaround) Kind regards Ernst

(...) ed in red) in the attribute matrix, hovering over the step name displays the message "Broken inheritance of settings" instead of the actual step name. Problem: This makes it difficult to identify steps , especially when names are similar (e.g., Approval I/II/III), and the limited display space with no text wrapping shows only a truncated version of the name. As a result, users cannot distinguish bet (...)

(...) Issue: In the attribute matrix view, when many process steps are defined, horizontal scrolling causes the first column with attribute names to scroll out of view. As a result, users lose context and cannot clearly see which attribute they are modifying when working with steps located at the far right. Problem: This creates a usability issue, especially in complex forms with dozens of steps , increa (...)

(...) nd load the remaining rows on demand via a button? Do you perhaps have an idea how to feed new rows at the step I marked in the diagram? Currently, the rows are loaded into a technical table at those steps , and then pulled into the final table. Maybe it would be worth moving the row loading into the technical table into a subprocess? If I explained something unclearly, please let me know – I will descr (...)

(...) We currently have 3 options for item list initialization: - On Starting steps - On Every step but not finish steps - None I'd like to propose a new one here - On Demand. This one would allow us to define how the item list should be initialized, but it will initialize only when called with INITIALIZE function in form rules OR by pressing the Initialize button on the form. In theory we can fill (...)

(...) I know it's "just" cosmetics, but anyway. Please, make the Flow Control element smaller or give us an option to resize it. It doesn't make much sense that it's bigger than all the square boxes for steps . Thanks.

(...) ters incorrect data or triggers sub-workflows, the process can move forward quickly before the error is discovered. Correcting this requires ad-hoc workarounds such as: - Creating custom “On Hold” steps with no tasks, - Adding complex path conditions or business rules, or - Manually reassigning or closing tasks. These solutions are difficult to maintain, especially in large applications with ma (...)