search results

Hello, I want to hide/show the buttons in an item list for : add row, delete row and clone but based on rule. To be more specific, I want the 3 buttons to be visible when the instance is using business entity 1, 2 and 3 , but when i use the business entity 4 i want them to be hidden. The only way I made it possible is by using a form rule with a Java Script, but could not see any build in We

Hi! I need your help regarding setting focus on the last row of the item list. Business wants to perform the following scenario. Batch of barcode lables from paper documents are to be scanned with hendheld scanner. Each scanned id is to be inserted into ID column of item list table. Based on the ID some additiona data are to displayed in other columns. What I have already done is the form rule th

(...) ting one - just because the original app had most of the needed fields. No issues exporting the new app into package. From the error message I presume that the original app had some [at least one] business rule s I didn't need for the new app, therefore I deleted them, thus the import error. Now, the new app does not point towards that id, 2752, with any object, either field/business rule /form rule etc. A (...)

(...) ting one - just because the original app had most of the needed fields. No issues exporting the new app into package. From the error message I presume that the original app had some [at least one] business rule s I didn't need for the new app, therefore I deleted them, thus the import error. Now, the new app does not point towards that id, 2752, with any object, either field/business rule /form rule etc. A (...)

(...) Hi everyone, it would really be great if we could have the option to check in a business rule whether the edit mode is active. Currently we can check for: - Admin mode - Mobile device - Share mode At the moment I'm using a combination of business rule and form rule to hide /show an element which is confusing. An alternative or maybe an even better option would be to provide a rule /function with (...)

(...) Hello, We have set a working Oracle connection. There is a procedure with 2 params, one IN, another OUT. Running a business rule containing a SQL Command against the Oracle connection: declare l_out NUMBER; begin ZZ_WEBCON_TEST.TEST_PROCEDURE(P_IN => {BRP:21}, X_OUT => l_out); end; where {BRP:21} is a business rule decimal parameter. The Rule is working, Oracle procedure gets executed (witness o (...)

(...) tomation rather than saving the value in a physical field. (Usually, these values are needed temporarily and it is not necessary to save them in a field). Another example : When we create a sdk type business rule and we want to use in a business rule with parameters. Thanks, Raluca

(...) I have three environments: PROD, TEST and DEV. My current WebCon BPS version: 2023.1.3.169. There was a global problem with business rule s in the TEST environment (it also occurred before the system update, i.e. 2023.1.3.76) - it is not possible to introduce a single new rule because an error immediately appears, as follows: Typ: System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException ------------------------------------------ (...)

(...) Hello, In many places we are able to create Process business rule from rule typed in a field (visibility, required, and many others). Similarly with form rules. I have a case, where i need to use same mail that is already being used, but to different people. (exactly 12 contents). Right now it requires manual creation of templates by copy-pasting them from action into e-mail template. Could we have 'Cr (...)

(...) Hello everyone, I need your assistance with something. I am currently working on a business rule that should return a value using SQL. The business rule needs to be as universal as possible, and I want to pass two parameters to the SQL query. So far, so good. The issue is that I want to pass the same form field as a parameter twice: once as a value and once as a "column name" (essentially as an object va (...)

(...) start the workflow with some data completed. When I drag the columns, one is showing a bit weird. It will show ok once you double click it. (picture 1) 2. I have another ForEach and inside I made a business rule that uses, again, info from column collection and it is working, but when I go to all business rule s and open it i will see something similar with the first example. (picture 2) The actions work, (...)

(...) Error: [Quote] Error occured during business rule evaluation. String values cannot be multiplied at: Evaluation requested at: Evaluation node: Operator (+) at: Evaluation node: Operator (*) at: Evaluation node: Operator (*) [/Quote] What I have : -process static A -process static B -process static C -process static D attribte a,b,c attribute a,b,c is changing dynamically vs Item List at (...)

(...) eads up so other people dont fall for the issue that hit us today. I wanted to share some info regarding the update from 2022 to 2023, as we ran into some very unsatisfying issues with SQL COMMAND business rule s that are querying field IDs. It hit us on some neuralgic spots in our main workflow, causing quite some pain right now. If you still have to update to 2023 make sure you test every SQL COMMAND ba (...)

(...) Daniel *Edit* While implementing the check I figured, that there's no general option to implement this. There are to many conditions. Nevertheless we can create something similar using a global business rule : https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2024/is-field-value-unique

(...) customer number field. I have a REST DataSource "REST GET CUSTOMER DATA" (..../getKundenData?customernumber=CUSTOMERNUMBER.Standard) which returns a json with all relevant customer data. I used a business rule to get the value from the REST datasource and a form rule (on value change) to set the customer name (returned from the businessrule). This is working fine. The problem is the mapping customern (...)

(...) o. Moreover a CSS low-code editor would be nice to build those styles via drag & drop und autocompletion and colorpicker in all style configuration fields. Maybe with "..." like it is for form and business rule s to open the rule editor. Kind Regards Sébastien

Hi, it would be nice if it would be possible to define local and global configurations for regular expressions like it is possible for business and form rules. There are many regular expressions that we need very often and it would be nice having them as templates for the expressions and the error message. The way to create a global field is known and used too but we don't want global fields

(...) Hi, we would like to pick a group in a form field and to use all members of this group as filter for another user picker field. Using the function GROUP MEMBERS [AD-Group Login and name] in a business rule works fine. Setting this one into an ALERT all members are returned as expected. Using 'testgroup' as string in the group picker of the function GROUP MEMBERS ['testgroup'] in a filter of a data sourc (...)

(...) Hi, while we can create business rule s which act similar to table valued / scalar functions, we can't pass the columns/data to them. The inner business rule s are executed before the outer SQL command is executed. This comes in really handy in a lot of cases but also has it's limitation and will require creating repetitive code. I would suggest the following: Create a new "type" "SQL function" Prop (...)