(...) I have three environments: PROD, TEST and DEV. My current WebCon BPS version: 2023.1.3.169. There was a global problem with business rule s in the TEST environment (it also occurred before the system update, i.e. 2023.1.3.76) - it is not possible to introduce a single new rule because an error immediately appears, as follows: Typ: System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException ------------------------------------------ (...)
(...) Hello, In many places we are able to create Process business rule from rule typed in a field (visibility, required, and many others). Similarly with form rules. I have a case, where i need to use same mail that is already being used, but to different people. (exactly 12 contents). Right now it requires manual creation of templates by copy-pasting them from action into e-mail template. Could we have 'Cr (...)
(...) Hello everyone, I need your assistance with something. I am currently working on a business rule that should return a value using SQL. The business rule needs to be as universal as possible, and I want to pass two parameters to the SQL query. So far, so good. The issue is that I want to pass the same form field as a parameter twice: once as a value and once as a "column name" (essentially as an object va (...)
(...) start the workflow with some data completed. When I drag the columns, one is showing a bit weird. It will show ok once you double click it. (picture 1) 2. I have another ForEach and inside I made a business rule that uses, again, info from column collection and it is working, but when I go to all business rule s and open it i will see something similar with the first example. (picture 2) The actions work, (...)
(...) Error: [Quote] Error occured during business rule evaluation. String values cannot be multiplied at: Evaluation requested at: Evaluation node: Operator (+) at: Evaluation node: Operator (*) at: Evaluation node: Operator (*) [/Quote] What I have : -process static A -process static B -process static C -process static D attribte a,b,c attribute a,b,c is changing dynamically vs Item List at (...)