WELCOME TO THE COMMUNITY
find what you are looking for or ask a new question

search results

for advanced

(...) Hi, In my opinion, the biggest advantage of BPS data sources is the ability to link to a selected element. However, the disadvantage is much lower performance in advanced conditions, inability to join data, use union, and combine data from different content databases. By changing the source from BPS to SQL, users lose the functionality of the link. Of course, we can achieve this in a different wa (...)

(...) Hi, I have an item list and a column for local attachments. In the advanced configuration settings for local attachments, the option 'Allow adding more than one attachment' is not selected. However, despite seeing a 'deny' icon when attaching files, I'm still able to click and add more than one attachment. Is this a bug? Version 2023.1.2.68

(...) layout is not enough. Sometime because of some specific requirements or where we wanted to provide additional options to guide the users through a large form. I also tried and failed creating an "advanced validation dialog". I wanted to display a dialog in which the user had to set some fields. I mainly failed because I couldn't replicate the logic attached to the choose fields and similar. Therefo (...)

(...) ions 2024.1.1.130 and 2024.1.1.161. 2024.1.1.130: #1 problem we noticed: We cannot see any past data vacations, mainly on a simpified report (black/white one). #2 problem we noticed: On a advanced report with colors we can see past vacations but not all types. 2024.1.1.161: All type of reports (simple/advanced ) dont show any past vacations. We updated to 2024.1.1.161 after finding changel (...)

(...) Hi, adding a new picture form field requires us nearly each time to set a higher picture size limit in the advanced configuration. It would be amazing if we could set a global picture size limit as default value in system settings. Kind Regards Sébastien

(...) Hi, we just faced a situation in which we deployed a process to a new (customer) environment. The license did not include the "advanced Analytics Framework". While testing everything we have run into a "License expired" error. This was raised by the "Start /Stop performance indicator" action. I didn't want to waste any more time and deactivated these action on the database level. While this is (...)

(...) Hi, it would be nice if using a field type choice field with behavior autocomplete would not only set configured target fields in the columns of general tab in advanced configuration. When the choice field gets deleted and is empty the target field values remain instead of getting deleted too. To get them deletion one hase to create a form rule. This wouldn't be necessary any more if there would be thi (...)

(...) S Search Server folder). • Update the JRE_HOME system environment variable to point to this location. • Restart the upgrade of Solr (done automatically after fail) Option 2 – Timing-Based Fix (advanced ): • As soon as the WEBCON BPS Search Server folder is recreated during setup, quickly copy Java back into it before the Search Server tries to start (you’ll have around 10–15 seconds). • This wor (...)

(...) , it would be nice if one could also create global form groups in system settings and not only single global fields. A use case would be address fields street, number, city, zip, country, ... with advanced configurations to data sources, reg exp and so on. In each app where this information is needed one could directly use this global form group. Kind Regards Sébastien

(...) e great, if the data table configuration dialog could be configured to: - Define the type of a column: Text, integer/decimal, date time, choose field - Provide a configuration dialog similar to the advanced configuration. This would: - Move the formatting from the server to the client - Solve the issue with the date time - Improve the user experience as the data table values would be displayed in (...)

(...) who are no longer active (e.g., for historical reference, archival workflows, former approvers, or when completing data in legacy processes). Please consider adding a new option (checkbox) in the advanced configuration of the “Person or group” form field [Include inactive accounts]. When selected, the field's data source should also return inactive users. The checkbox should be unchecked by default t (...)

(...) .g. with a red exclamation mark in the beginning/middle/end of the path. A warning could even prevent saving the process until all such paths have a task assignment. This is already done e.g. when an advanced configuration has not been entered after adding a choice form field. Kind regards Sébastien

(...) ditor using [Data source columns | newHash] [Data source columns | diHash] leads to the SQL code (N[newHash] [diHash]). The "N" causes the error "Incorrect syntax near 'newHash'". When using the advanced filter the generated SQL code is diHash newHash and the query runs fine. May it be possible to get the same behavior in the standard filter editor as well? Kind regards Sébastien PS: This (...)

(...) Hi, I suggest to add a custom CSS box in the configuration of a report view. One use case is to override the default CSS of tiles. The advanced JSON works like a charm to customize each column. But it’s clearly not possible to customize the outer tile. A simple needed custom CSS would be to create a 4 column design by just setting a tile’s width to 24% instead of default 100% and to hide all colu (...)

(...) I already asked a similar question regarding a signature field. I updated the Word template because old references broke it apparently, then and then it worked. I now have a multi-line advanced text field with settings and editor. I tried to add in word as rich text field control with and without Business rule / only text field value. Should I try to create the word again until it works ? Or is i (...)

(...) Hi, in the configuration of a report it is possible to have a dropdown of steps of the workflow in the advanced filters section. But those addtional filters can be deselected from users. That's why I suggest to have the same functionality with dropdowns with all values also in default filters instead of limited matching criteria and a static value. Indicating a step id here breaks the report after imp (...)

(...) o match the target form, and I also tried leaving the Path configuration completely blank to target the registration step matrix, but the list still won't show up for mapping. I tried switching to advanced Edit Mode, but the source form fields tree on the right doesn't load the structural parameters either. Has anyone encountered this specific behavior where an Item List is ignored by the subworkflo (...)

(...) a direct impact on the `CacheOrganizationStructure`. This behavior is unexpected and can lead to severe administrative issues. The **User List Synchronization Configuration** already provides an **advanced ** tab where synchronization filters can be defined. Because of this, it is not obvious why additional filters configured on the default `` data source also affect the synchronized user and group cach (...)

(...) S Create a choice picker autocomplete form field C Set one of the columns of the autocomplete as target field of field S Save Process P1 Copy this autocomplete to another process P2 Check the advanced configuration of the autocomplete field and confirm that there is no target field set (only "None" values) Now switch to process P1 and check the usage tab for field S. There will be a reference t (...)

(...) me way as it is with data table field or as it can be handled for item lists. There are two checkboxes for "Show form field name" and "Show form field description". This would be great to have in the advanced configuration of a field group. Kind regards, Sébastien