Daniel Krüger (Cosmo Consult)

HI AndreeLi, there are also two "sending single mail" actions in the workflow history. At least this it what happened to me, when I was informed, when it happened. But I have no idea what's the underyling root cause. Best regards, Daniel

Hi, the problem ist, that I don't have access to a SharePoint anymore and I can't test it myself. So I can only provide limited help. If you would have used something else than the generic list I would have guessed, that a feature is missing. You could also try with the name of the templat

Hi AndreeLI, I for my part have stopped understanding when which mails are send to whom. In the past it typically involved something with language: - Language of the process - Language of the user - Whether the use has signed into the portal at all. If someone can elaborate on this, please

Hi Daruisz, yes we do and haven't found (bothered) to identify the reason when it get's lost. In WEBCON BPS 2023 there's a new Preview which can be enabled in the form field matrix. I hope that this will be an appropriate/better replacement. I've only read the change log. Best regards,

Hi AndreeLi, the template refers to the type of list which should be created. Depending on the type different options are provided. Here you have an overview: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/sharepoint_protocols/ms-wssts/8bf797af-288c-4a1d-a14b-cf5394e636cf Best regards, Da

Hi Christian, thanks, I didn't thought of this. :) Using the option to execute business rules from form rules which is available since 2022 this could actually be a replacement for the validate form action. The condition/validation rule could be defined in a business rule or form rule. This

Hi everyone, I think it would be great to have an opportunity to add the option to execute a form rule in case of a 'Validate form' action fails. In most of my cases there some special condition which relates to a field/tab. Having the option to execute a form rule would allow to: - focus the

Hi Flo, since the column WFD_AttText1 could be the title in one process and in another a Comment, it typically doesn't make sense to do this. The only exception from this is global fields, but these should have the same meaning across all processes they would be selectable. For your use cas

Thanks for posting the solution. In could help others :)

What a coincidence, I got a request this afternoon to modify a data table which displays information about subworkflows. The comments from the subworkflows should be displayed. Here's the part regarding extracting the comments and concatenating them back Best regards, Daniel ,(select STUF

Hi Michał, is the f_clear_desription a custom function? I can't find it in my databases. Have you checked whether the value is converted, when an instance is saved? I don't have a similar environment, so I can't verify it. If this the case you could use a date or alternatively you could test

Hi, the license service is a part of the windows WEBCON Workflow service and needs to be enabled.. If this is the case and even after restarting the service you could take a look at the windows event log. There's a separate event "log area" for Webcon in the navigation. The events are not part

HI Radek, this is simply not possible. Best regards, Daniel

Hi Damian, maybe I'm missing something at leas in my case it seems to work just fine: 1. Defined a column of type "related attachment" 2. Defined a simplified dynamic query which uses the attachment id of the parent workflow attachment. The document is referenced. Best regards, Daniel

Hi, Ok, let's ignore the fact that you would need to replicate any change in the cloned workflow. The cloning will generate new ids for every element. The most relevant would be - Workflow - Steps - Paths Are you using any of these information in any automation / view / data table fiel

That's an interesting idea Nik. It will probably be easier to handle any issue with the request using the PS script. I'm guessing that you pass the filename to the PS script so that you can retrieve the correct file for this workflow instance using the SDK action. Or you are passing the instance id

In this case I would do the following: 1) Add global constants for the Ids of the groups 2) Create a field for example "Responsible department" where those groups are used. 3) Use the field in the task 4) Add a start tile for those groups settings the id of the group as a default value. I'm

Hi AndreeLi, the best way would be to avoid the duplicated process, but that's obviously an answer from someone who doesn't know your use case. Maybe you could elaborate on these questions: 1. Do you only need to change the task assignment? 2. Are different privileges are assigned in the De

Hi Patryk, as far as I can tell it's somehow related to the automatic checkout of the current workflow instance to the user. I haven't seen this before so my only ideas right now are: 1) Does your account has values for display name and mail address? I'm asking this because if either is null t

Hi Klaus, the easiest option would be to use a calculated column. I have to variations for this: 1) Number of attachments (select Count(*) from WFDataAttachmets where ATT_WFDID = WFD_ID) 2) Traffic light/indicator whether an attachment exists (case when (select Count(*) from WFDataAttac