search results

(...) forward quickly before the error is discovered. Correcting this requires ad-hoc workarounds such as: - Creating custom “On Hold” steps with no tasks, - Adding complex path conditions or business Rules , or - Manually reassigning or closing tasks. These solutions are difficult to maintain, especially in large applications with many steps and sub-workflows. 🚀 Proposed enhancement Introduce (...)

(...) Hello, it would be great if there was an option that shows where WEBCON user groups are used similar to what we have for form fields and business/for Rules . Also, an option to add description similar to office 365 groups. Thank you

(...) ll itself Mapping the response into form fields (e.g. writing error_msg into a field like rest_response) What does not work: Field changes done by the Automation do not trigger OnChange business Rules (expected behaviour, since the change happens on the backend). Throwing an Automation error after the REST call only allows static error text – dynamic values (e.g. the error message returned by the (...)

(...) customer, using values from an Item List. Following that action, I'm using another "Generate an Excel file" action to then update the existing Excel and map it's column name cells (A1-Z1) to Business Rules containing translations for those column names, so we don't have to use our internal Item List names. That now leads to the generated - translated Excel to become corrupted, as supposedly, its intern (...)

(...) printable confirmation for the user? Does WEBCON BPS have a built-in task scheduler / job scheduler (harmonogram zadań)? What are plugin packages mainly used for, considering that many business Rules and logic can already be configured using the standard rule editor (click-based configuration)? Is it possible to create custom configurations with custom objects/entities that are not standard WE (...)

(...) ty: Dynamic adaptation to different inputs or contexts is cumbersome or impossible without workarounds. Proposed Improvement: Introduce parameter support for Data Sources, similar to how Business Rules allow input parameters. Parameters could include: - Filter values (e.g., a specific cost center, OU, or status) - Context values (e.g., current user, workflow field, or system variable) This wou (...)

(...) Hi, right now configurations are process specific and contain amongst others business Rules , form Rules , constants, automations. If multiple processes of the same app or even other apps need one of those there is the possibility to create a global equivalent in system settings. Unfortunatelly global objects have no app binding functionality as data sources have. Some global constants, business or (...)

(...) for a given workflow instance. Here are two examples: {COLUMN:ID#ID} in ('KHL_030','KHL_020') {COLUMN:ID#ID} in ('KHL_001','KHL_010') #"Dynamic" value Since there are no options to use business Rules or similar in a data source filter of a choose field I'm preparing the filter value on step entry. This is sufficient for this case.. #With a standard SQL data source I would use one of these opti (...)

(...) Furthermore, in the location where I copied it, when I go to "Use" I see that it's being used in the location from which I copied it. I'm wondering if this isn't a global problem with business Rules , because when saving changes in Designer Studio, I now often get an error suggesting that a business rule with this ID already exists. I would appreciate your feedback. Regards, D. --1-- (...)

(...) ble to just copy & paste the HTML code to other environments without having to replace all occurrences of those references. Therefore I suggest to use GUIDs instead of IDs. Having global business Rules for the email template would be great too. Kind regards Sébastien

(...) Hi! Please make it possible to to switch off character escaping of result text in business Rules ! Or at least allow to use RAW mode for local variables in automation. It causes problems when you prepare api call body with business rule. Only workaround I know it to use update content into a formfield and refer it with RAW mode in API call action. Thanks! Peter

(...) rve item-level read permissions during archiving. This would make the archiving feature much more useful in enterprise scenarios where performance optimization must still respect existing security Rules . I think this would be valuable for many WEBCON BPS customers who need to archive large amounts of data without compromising access control. Please vote if you also need archived elements to ke (...)

(...) Forum Rules Welcome to the WEBCON community forum. To ensure the best possible experience for everyone, we kindly ask that you adhere to the guidelines listed below. By participating in the forum, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to follow the established Rules . You also agree to keep forum discussion limited to topics best suited for this type of medium. We wish for this forum t (...)