search results

Hello, I have a little problem. My scenario is something like this: I have an item list, with 3 columns A, B(not important here) and C and I want to disable column C(data row), if column A(choice field) has value 1#Mother, for example. Even if it's a new row just added by the user at that moment, even if it's a row added previously by other user in another step.. I just simply want that column

(...) I have three environments: PROD, TEST and DEV. My current WebCon BPS version: 2023.1.3.169. There was a global problem with business rule s in the TEST environment (it also occurred before the system update, i.e. 2023.1.3.76) - it is not possible to introduce a single new rule because an error immediately appears, as follows: Typ: System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException --------------------------------- (...)

(...) Hello all, I have a process that can be started either from a Parent workflow or in the workflow, using a menu option (creating a sub-task). In the start step, I have editability rule s, if the user is creating a sub-task, some fields can be edited, but if the task has come from another process, those fields cannot be changed. In the URL, I'm passing the ID when the user creates a sub-task to a (...)

(...) some powershell - all of those support autocompletion (which in most cases of recent software is supported by language server protocol). Could we get a built in autocompletion for custom business rule s inside Designer Studio? I'm leaving 2 examples of how autocompletion works in Azure Data Studio, and leaving one additional concept what kind of autocompletions i would like to see. Creating it (...)

(...) Hello everyone, I need your assistance with something. I am currently working on a Business rule that should return a value using SQL. The Business rule needs to be as universal as possible, and I want to pass two parameters to the SQL query. So far, so good. The issue is that I want to pass the same form field as a parameter twice: once as a value and once as a "column name" (essentially as an (...)

(...) Hi, It will by werry usefull to have this option in business rule s. Regards.

(...) o other people dont fall for the issue that hit us today. I wanted to share some info regarding the update from 2022 to 2023, as we ran into some very unsatisfying issues with SQL COMMAND business rule s that are querying field IDs. It hit us on some neuralgic spots in our main workflow, causing quite some pain right now. If you still have to update to 2023 make sure you test every SQL COMMAND ba (...)

Hi, can you share some example code for those types of plugins?

Hi, I have a question about this option in the Visibility configuration of the attribute. 1. I wonder why this option is always grayed out. What does it mean - is it always on or off? Is the SOLR always indexing this attribute regardless of what visibility is set? https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2024R1/Studio/Process/Attribute/General/Attribute_Permissions 2. I wonder if there is a possibili

Hi, the "new" confirm/alert functions are really great and please don't remove the option to pass HTML as a parameter. :) Yet there's always room for improvement. Could we get additional/optional parameter for the title, yes and no button? Depending on the context the labels "Confirmation", "Yes" and "No" may not be the best. For example this would be the default labels Title: Confirm

(...) Good day webcon community, As the title states, i ask myself if javascript is faster than using formrule s. As example i had a formrule what would get the sum of a number column in an item list and compare it to another field. It took sometime for the formrule to procress this, while my javascript that i wrote in a html element did it much faster. I wonder now if i should reimplement certain funct (...)

(...) Hello How to trigger Automation with standard actions (On attachment add – there is only one action related OneDrive allowed) or trigger Form rule on attachment changes? I need it for scenario: Requestor add/add new/overwrite/delete attachment in the very same step without pressing save or going to another step (change in attachments is there even if one close the browser tab without previous saving (...)

(...) Hi all! I just wanted to know, if there is a more sophisticated way to rename a tab or a field label in a form rule . We did some hacks in the past (e.g. renaming a tab in a register depending on some conditions), but since these changes are relying on HTML markup of a specific version, these scripts will definitely break in the next major version. Is there a better way to rename a tab in a re (...)

(...) Hello, I would like to set a comment as required depending on a value of a data table. Is it possible to make this requirement dependent on a business rule ? If so, how would I proceed here? Thank you very much!

(...) . Even if the documentation is updated to mention this different behavior. I find it counter intuitive that this should be a different Instead of changing the current way, I would prefer a form rule which can be used to display an attachment in the preview. This way we wouldn't be limited to the first attachment but could get the attachment to display with a business rule or similar. Best reg (...)

(...) Hi, I would like to ask if anyone has encountered such an error when trying to use a global business rule with parameters. The error occurred on version 2025.1.1.152. Message:Due to the current state of the object, the operation is invalid. ------------------------------------------------------- Call path ------------------------------------------------------- w WebCon.WorkFlow.BusinessLogi (...)

(...) Hi, it would be nice if having a third behavior function next to the two behavior functions ENABLE and DISABLE for form rule s that permits the field to be edited via JS but not writeable by the user. Kind Regards Sébastien

(...) I have some form rule s that have parameters, i would like to trigger them in a javascript/formrule javascript. However it seems there is no way input the parameters when invoking the form rule . Does somebody know a way to do this?

(...) Hi, it would be nice if one could not only chose "CREATE rule " in the context menu of a field supporting rule s. An option "CREATE GLOBAL rule " would be helpful if we want to turn a "local" rule to a "global" one. It is clear that not all options in a "local" rule can be turned to a global one but there are cases where there would be no problem. Kind Regards Sébastien

(...) Hi, while we can create business rule s which act similar to table valued / scalar functions, we can't pass the columns/data to them. The inner business rule s are executed before the outer SQL command is executed. This comes in really handy in a lot of cases but also has it's limitation and will require creating repetitive code. I would suggest the following: Create a new "type" "SQL function (...)