search results

(...) fIgnoreVisible) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl() at System.Windows.Forms.Control.SetVisibleCore(Boolean value) at DevExpress.XtraNavBar.NavBarGroup.SetControlContainervisibility (Boolean visible) at DevExpress.XtraNavBar.NavBarGroup.UpdateControlContainer(Rectangle clientBounds) at DevExpress.XtraNavBar.ViewInfo.NavBarViewInfo.UpdateGroupBounds() at DevExpre (...)

(...) Hello everyone, I have a question for you, maybe you can help me. I know you can set user privileges for each application or process separately, but I wonder if I can also restrict user visibility depending on some criteria.. For this scenario I've created: BPS user group: Software Engineer person X, person Y, person Z are part of software group Let's say there are also multiple projects and their (...)

(...) Hi! We are in the process of upgrading from 2017 to 2021 - testing phase. I have a problem with the visibility and requirement rules for fields in an item list, when the contents of one cell affect the behavior of another cell in the same row. The existing rules do not work. What is wrong?

(...) 9 attributes in a group and would like to place them in a matrix 3 x 3 (let's say in this case this is the best layout for some purpose) now I have to create 3 groups of 3 attributes and turn off the visibility of group names. My idea is to make system do it by itself. One more advantage is that in Designer Studio the groups wouldn't have to be artificially divided - clearer and more logical appearance.

(...) days that were previously automatically calculated based on the items already in the workflow are the problem and probably an error occurs when the engine tries to calculate them. When I turn off the visibility of both fields and leave only the "from previous year" and "from current year" ones visible, tha chart works. It stops working as soon as I try to make "Used" visible. The problem occurs only when (...)

(...) 1. Issue: you cannot setup field availibility for archived instances Proposal: there could be a 3rd form editor like standard/mobile form have. Or/and additional field matrix setting controlling visibility on archive form. 2. Issue: Instance level privileges are not inherited to archived instances. It is a problem as we have readonly permissions granted based on instance attribute. (use case: I (...)

(...) need one by one move to tab ... and they are (can) mix ... I cant march few attributes and move to each tab ... I can move group but not to tab ... it is time consuming ... and is easier to turn off visibility of group than each attribute ...

(...) Hello, In many places we are able to create Process Business Rule from rule typed in a field (visibility , required, and many others). Similarly with form rules. I have a case, where i need to use same mail that is already being used, but to different people. (exactly 12 contents). Right now it requires manual creation of templates by copy-pasting them from action into e-mail template. Could we have (...)

(...) Hi! I have a question on how to direct visibility of attribute based on which Tab is active. I created a group of attributes then added tab panel and few tabs. In group configuration I checked Horizontal arrangement because I want attributes in tabs to be placed horizontally. Now I want to add new attribute below this horizontal ones (att2: field name "Wycofaj poprzednio złożone oświadczenie"). I want a (...)