search results

(...) permission to edit WorkFlow instance"). Is there any work around to this or maybe a different action that would allow people to be able to print even if the task is not with them and don't have edit privilege s. Thank you for your assistance!

(...) of business rule and form rule to hide /show an element which is confusing. An alternative or maybe an even better option would be to provide a rule /function with checks, whether a user has edit privilege s. Best regards, Daniel

(...) ived instances Proposal: there could be a 3rd form editor like standard/mobile form have. Or/and additional field matrix setting controlling visibility on archive form. 2. Issue: Instance level privilege s are not inherited to archived instances. It is a problem as we have readonly permissions granted based on instance attribute. (use case: Incoming invoice visibility for users depends on invoice (...)

(...) Hi, Having admin privilege s on a given element, it would be very convenient to have access to at least 2 options such as: permission check and task completion. Now you need to perform 3 operations 1. enter admin mode 2. expand admin actions 3. select the action in question Regards

(...) m using the global search. Sadly it does not work. It should be able to search using info from pdf that is attached to one instance, but obvious it does not work. I tried to give this user admin privilege s and still nothing has changed regarding global search. I also did a restart for the webcon search service and IIS. I also want to mention something important, the user has already privilege s on ot (...)

(...) thin" and they are not somehow modified by an external source may it be the UI or REST. Besides the fact that I'm confused about this change, it's strange that we can disable "Check logged-in user privilege s" but are limited by the field visibility. It would be great if one of these changes would be introduced: - If the logged-in user privilege s are ignored, then the field visibility should be igno (...)

(...) uration. However, regardless of how we enter the user credentials, we encounter the following error: “You have entered invalid user credentials.” The user we’re using has been granted the necessary privilege s for managing users in AAD (users.administrator). The documentation I referred to: https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2024R1/Studio/Action/AD/Action_ActiveDirector0 https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2024R1 (...)

(...) it would be great if a workflow instance of a specific form type would be excluded. For example when a workflow instance get's "archived", we change the form type, so that we can configure different privilege s. Yes, we can restrict the access but that's not always possibile and than these workflow instances may pop up. Best regards, Daniel