User Voice

Hi,

could we please get a user friendly error message like:

No licenses are assigned to you (someone@example.com) please inform your system administrators (List of the users who can assign licenses).

Best regards,
Daniel

Hi,

in BPS 2024 an option was added to the license that customers can use SDKs provided by partners without an SDK license. This is made possible by providing the public key which is then somehow integrated to the license.

I'm wondering whether it would be possible to also integrate the WEBCON and partner Microsoft Entra Id domain names. During the license check for the current user, it could be checked whether the current user is a guest account _and_ belongs to such a domain. If this is true, the account could be treated as an admin with all licenses.
- Unlimited solution access,
- Designer Desk
- Designer Studio

This would be similar to the "Administrator mode" of the Designer Studio, which doesn't work for WEBCONAPPS. It would also work for the web based Designer Studio.

Even if any partner account would gain the license, it would still be necessary to assign the allowed privileges. So this wouldn't cause issues with these.

Whenever we are starting with new customers, they get a very limited number of licenses in the beginning. Adding this option would remove the unnecessary topic why the customer need to purchase licenses for the accounts/users of the partner in addition to paying him. I always dread this conversation because it's a very reasonable question and I don't have any other arguments then "that's the way it is'.

Best regards,
Daniel

Hi,

I just noticed, that the "Uniform view of all item list cells" check box has been removed.
It's not the case that I wanted to activate it, but I wanted to deactivate it.
The reason for this is, that the uniform can take up way more space than a mixed one. Especially if there's a multi line column.

According to the documentation it should be there but it does neither exist in the UI nor in the XML configuration in version 2025.1.1.105. I assume that in this case the documentation wasn't updated and the functionality has been removed deliberately.


Best regards,
Daniel

Hi Kamil,

I don't think this will have any meaningful impact from a performance perspective.

The searching for start/contains happens after the data source has returned all available data. This means, that all data is already in memory.

While it's not possible to pass the filters to REST data sources at all, I don't see an option for SQL queries.

While it may work out somehow to add the condition for simple SQL statements like this:
Original query:
select WFD_ID from WFElements where WFD_DTYPEID = 1
->
Using filtered column
select WFD_ID from WFElements where (WFD_DTYPEID = 1) and (picker column like 'search value%')

I don't see a reliable option for complex queries where UNIONs are used or CTEs.
OK, for unions you could wrap the whole result in another SELECT again.


select * from (
select WFD_ID from WFElements where WFD_DTYPEID = 1
union
select WFD_ID from WFElements where WFD_DTYPEID = 2
) as temp where(picker column like 'search value%')


But for CTEs?

Best regards,
Daniel

Great news Michał, thank you!

If you're interested in enhancing your professional presence, consider exploring [url=https://www.resumefolks.com/]Resume Folks[/url] for expert resume writing and career services.

Given other priorities, we stick with the recommendation to use floating-point number fields.

Given other priorities, we stick with the recommendation to use floating-point number fields.

We'll make it happen!

There's a chance it will be introduced in the new (web) Studio.

For now, I put it under review.