User Voice

Hi,
It often happens that the list of items should have unique values, at least in 1 column.
Currently, I often create and add a script to check when adding an item with this value already exists.
A great convenience would be the option in the column configuration, 'unique item'.
The user would receive an alert that an item with this value has already been added to the list.

Regards.

Adding a confirmation dialog for the process cloning action. Occasionally, users may accidentally click the clone button, and this accidental click leads to cloning the entire process, along with the full process/action definition, etc.

Dear Daniel,
Yes, that’s definitely something to address. Additionally, I would suggest including an element history feature along with design alignment for a more cohesive experience.

Best.

Hi everyone,

if I'm using an HTML field it would be great, if there wouldn't be any margins imposed on the control (1).
My only idea right now is to remove the class which causes this via JavaScript in the HTML field, so that it is aligned with the other controls (2).

<script>
document.getElementById("SEL_HTML_#{WFCON:7009}#").querySelector(".grid-template__panel .upsidePanel__content").classList.remove("upsidePanel__content")
</script>

or with CSS:
<style>
#SEL_HTML_#{WFCON:7009}# .upsidePanel__content {margin-inline-end: 0px;margin-inline-start: 0px}
</style>


Best regards,
Daniel

Hello Marc,

Data is not duplicated in the database if you don't make changes to the attachment. Basic attachment information is stored in the database in the [WFDataAttachments] table, while the attachment history, triggered by any edits, is stored in the [WFAttachmentFiles] table. If you make changes to the attachment, such as updating the category or description using WEBCON actions, the version history will increase.

This would save a lot of ressources!

I absolutely agree, Marc! It is the customers with a huge amount of instances who get the most value from using Advanced Analytics Framework and archiving instances is necessary for exact those customers. Therefore archived instances need to be collected bei the Advanced Analytics Framework.

Hello everyone,

each time an instance is edited via a path, the attachments are duplicated in the database, even though they may not have been customized.

Would it be possible for the attachments to only be duplicated if the current version has actually been edited?

Best regards
Marc

Hello everyone,

Unfortunately, no archived instances are currently taken into account in the Advanced Analytics Framework. Since we perform archiving cyclically to keep the memory requirements on our SQL server low, the required process insights are not displayed in the Analytics Framework.

For large processes, the processes are currently archived 3 months after the instance is completed. In principle, however, we would like to archive the processes relatively directly after completion, but then they can no longer be found via the global search. For a simpler month-end closing, however, our financial accounting department needs a quick and easy way to access all instances.

In short, we would like to see better integration of the archived instances in the Advanced Analytics Framework and in the system search.

I look forward to your feedback!

Best regards
Marc

Hi,
A useful option would be the ability to capture and save the output of a powershell action, either to an attribute or to a local variable.
Similar to the mapping of response values in a REST action.

This would allow the received data to be further processed/used in subsequent autumatization actions.

Regards.