User Voice
Hi, form fields in the Objects tab of the form rule editor don’t get displayed in standard mode. Only when switching to JS mode the form fields appear. In the form rule editor of a Validate form action the form fields appear in the Objects tab. More details here in the conversation with Jacek: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/8410 It would be more consistent and convenient if form fields would always appear in the Objects tab of a form rule editor and the workaround by usin (...)
Hi, REST web services may need some custom headers for authentication, content-type, authorization and so on. Right now one has to configure those custom headers for each REST web services data source and invoke action using the connection. My suggestion is to add default custom headers in the connection as Postman does it in the configuration of its collections. By having this all data sources and invoke actions can inherit those default custom headers. Optional further custom headers (...)
Dear Community, The migration of privileges (https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/migration-of-privileges/190/4) is a very useful tool for copying permissions from one user to another. At the moment, however, it operates only on a global level. It would be highly beneficial to extend this functionality by introducing a filtering option that allows administrators to specify which applications or processes should be included in the migration. Of course, an “All” option should remain available (...)
Hi, it would be great if there would be AND and OR operators in the mandatory standars filters of a report and BPS internal view. Between the individual filters a AND/OR selection would realize this suggestion. It would be even better if some filters could be grouped for having eg: (Group 1 A and B and C ) OR (Group 2 D and E ) The logic operator inbetween a group could be restricted to be the same to keep it less comlex. Kind regards Sébastien
Hi, it would be great having some more operator functions in a mandatory standard filter of a report and BPS internal view. There are eg EQUAL and NOT EQUAL (with the options ID and name) but this functions would be really helpfull: (NOT) CONTAINS (NOT) STARTS WITH (NOT) ENDS WITH (NOT) IN (for check of value collection) Kind regards Sébastien
Hi, if a column (e.g. with checkboxes) gets to narrow its title gets cut. By simply adding a HTML title attribute with the column name to the div holding the column title the title gets displayed on mouse hover. I’ve attached a screenshot with the suggested modification. Kind regards Sébastien
Hi, please unlock the dropdown in the offset setting of a timer. If so it would be possible to select eg 15 minutes to have a delay before the first activation. The „workaround“ with a technical field that gets set NOW + 15 minutes wouldn‘t be necessary with this enabled selection. Source of suggestion: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/8381 Kind regards Sébastien
Hi, the AD attribute personalTitle (containing Mr., Ms., Mrs., Dr., Prof., …) is not part of the default user synchronisation configuration. It would be great to add this as a default attribute instead of having to map it to an extension attribute. Kind regards Sébastien
Hi, it would be really nice if it would be possible to add a "data source table widget" to a dashboard that can just be filled with data of a data source instead of only "report data tables" with information of processes. The data source should have the same sort and filter possibilities in the dashboard as in processes. There is so much data in data sources we'd like to visualize, search, filter, ... on a dashboard. As a dev imagine a WEBCON monitoring dashboard that has lots of widget (...)
Hi, an automation can have parameters with given data types. In the parameter settings there is a small icon showing the data type. When using the automation there are no icons to indicate the data type. That's why we write the data type as prefix in the parameter name as a workaround. It would be much nicer if there would be a small icon too as prefix of the name. Kind regards Sébastien
Hi, if we have a process relation the mail for such a workflow will be the "primary" application. If we want to change this "primary" application, we currently need to: - Remove all presentation elements in the target application - Delete the relation in the target application - Move the process - Recreate all presentation elements This takes a lot of time. It's quicker to fiddle around in the database. But this is neither supported nor even an option in the multi-tenant SaaS. If (...)
Hi, it would be great if a community user could manage and change it‘s mail address under „Your account“. Kind regards Sébastien
Hi, if a path leads to an intermediate step the path must have a selected task assignment in the „Task creation“ tab. If it‘s missing there is a warning in the Portal and the task assignment has to be defined. This commonly occurs e.g. when a new intermediate step is added and connected with an entry path or when deleting a flow control after connecting the existing path leading to the flow control to an intermediate step. To minimize this kind of error and turn development even more effi (...)
Hi, right now configurations are process specific and contain amongst others business rules, form rules, constants, automations. If multiple processes of the same app or even other apps need one of those there is the possibility to create a global equivalent in system settings. Unfortunatelly global objects have no app binding functionality as data sources have. Some global constants, business or form rules and automations may contain critical data (e.g. api tokens) that should not be use (...)
Hi, unfortunatelly global "objects" (business rules, form rules, constants, automations) have no app binding functionality as data sources have. Some global constants, business or form rules and automations may contain critical data (e.g. api tokens) that should not be useable by all devs with studio access. An option to set an object as protected and enabling an app binding to allow the usage would solve this matter. Default would be same behavior as it is now. If a dev wants to protect t (...)
Hi, right now app, process and workflow's associated form type user privileges can only be set for users and/or groups. It would be great if global business rules could be used too. A filter could be set that only global business rules with return type „user list“ can be used. This way e.g. a business admin could manage users in a dictionary and dynamic privileges would be possible with a business rule that selects users of this dictionary. Kind regards Sébastien
Hi, when workflow models evolve over time, it becomes increasingly difficult to understand how a workflow model looked or behaved in earlier versions. Although version history exists, it is currently not easy to visualize or analyze previous workflow designs. It would be very helpful if the workflow model history allowed users to navigate through past versions and view the corresponding workflow diagram exactly as it existed at that time. Suggested features (for the new Web Studio): 1. (...)
Hi, in the Information Panel, steps that have the path parameter option “Set current step as finished” enabled are currently displayed with a checkmark once the path is taken. This works well for paths that lead to an intermediate step or positive completion of a process. However, it can be misleading when such a path leads to a negative final step (for example: rejected, cancelled, declined). Even though the step is technically finished, the checkmark visually suggests a successful out (...)
Hi, I would like to suggest adding a line jump (or bridge) feature for crossing paths in Workflow Designer (at least for the Web versions). Currently, when two lines intersect without a jump, it often creates ambiguity. Users cannot easily distinguish whether the lines are simply crossing or if there is a logical junction or which path goes to which step without hovering over the path. Incorporating line jumps would significantly enhance visual clarity and prevent misinterpretation of proc (...)
Hi, right now there is no possibility to configure a template in a data source that could be used when selecting this data source in a picker field for the advanced configuration. Each time the advanced configuration has to be set up manually. Pickers for users or departments are used very often and it's a mess to reconfigure each time the wished default advanced configuration - especially for the columns configuration in the "General" tab. As a workaround we have created a "Template App" wit (...)
+48 12 443 13 90