Hi everyone, the current option to generate word documents with the Word AddIn is great for a lot of use cases. We did a little PoC and we noticed that we could cover even more if there would be a "power user" option. The generation used the Aspose library which supports a template syntax. T
Hi, I think Karol refers to the "OnEntry" trigger of a step. These actions/automations are always when any path leads to this step. Either from another step or from the same step. It doesn't matter. I have no idea how the Polish term is, but maybe it translates to "input". It could be a "false
Hi Raluca, Internally Form Types are called doc types. They were renamed some time before I started using WEBCON I would guess. So you would find the name in DTYPE_Name if I remember correctly. Here you have an overview of other tables. https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/configurati
Hi Andree, checking for duplicates would basically consist of setting up a valid form action, would basically check whether any other workflow matches your condition. What is a duplicate will depend on your case. You can take a look at this example: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thr
Hi Przemysław, you using the function would be one option. Other are: - Set the local parameter using an SQL command - Use the for each function to iterate through the attachments - Use the for each function in combination with a data source - Use the for each function in combination with "an
Hi, due to the WEBCON DAY tomorrow you may have to wait for answers. By default there's no filtering of the item list. I have two ideas in mind. a) Do you need the unchecked lines later in the process or can you go back from to this step? If this is not the case I would just remove the unchec
Hi Roman, if you don't need to use REST data sources. This may help you as a workaround. I had a slightly different issue. The customer created an application for accessing SPO. I could neither use the provided SharePoint login options nor the OAuth options. I had to get an access token myse
There’s now a knowledge base article regarding this change: https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/indexed-choice-columns/406/3
Hi Roman, my solution would be similar to Karols. What I don't understand is the part: "(this is because "everyone" can make a change request to a request - but should not have access to all requests [it is more about the fact that a request should be "improved" by other persons or departments
Linking another post related to BPS 2023 R2 https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3515 Not sure whether this was also the case in BPS 2023 R1 but in BPS 2023 R2 GetValue was changed. While this worked with WFD_AttText1 and AttText1 GetValue(parameterValue) You need to remove WFD_ in R2
Hi Adam, just in case you didn't solve it yourself. This can be achieved very easy with form rules: 1. Create a form rule in JavaScript mode 2. Add two parameters and use this code, where you replace the ParameterField, ParameterValue with yours console.log(ParameterField) document.queryS
Even so there are only two positive replies here, I know that there will be more at the event itself. Or the agenda is outdated. :) @Manuel I hope you have an interesting time in Italy. Maybe it will work out next year. :) Best regards, Daniel
Hi, let me add an englisch screenshot for this. If the report icon is not available, you have to add it first. Afterwards you have a license section in the report where you can view the "Workflow users". Unfortunately, there's also a report "Workflow users" in the Statistics section. If
Hi everyone, in case you are really needing the data from this endpoint, e.g. you can't get the data via a business rule. You could grab/take a look at: https://github.com/Daniel-Krueger/webcon_snippets/blob/main/utils/utils.js and use getLiteModel https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2023/ux-f
Hi everyone, who else will join the WEBCON DAY? My flight and hotel are booked and I can't wait to be there again. :) Maybe we can take the opportunity to meet in person and take a picture as a group. :) Daniel
Hi Christian, could you move the choice fields into the item list row? This would make it far easier, you could even activate a "modal dialog" style of entering the data, so it would have a similar look and feel as normal fields. Here's a short overview on how I would have done it. The number
Hi Flo, yes, the visibility restriction looking good in theory. Even so I have no idea what "HR" is. It should probably be the name of a group. https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2023R2/Studio/BusinessRules_General/#users CURRENT USER IS ONE OF - the function checks if the current user is in a spe
Hi Cristian, welcome to the community. :) Let me phrase this in my word, so that you can verify whether I understood it correctly. 1. You have a "product group" field, where you select one "product group". 2. Depending on this. the rows in the item list should be updated. You could ach
Hi Flo, Archive: You could take a look at this post and choose the appropriate option https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1401?messageid=1401 Full instance form: The only option I see is to define a visibilty restriction, which would hide all fields for anyone except for admins or ano
Hi, it would be great when form rules would be stored in a minimized version too. This minimized version would be used by default whenever a form rule is send to the client in a HTTP response. When a query parameter like 'minimized=0' is added, the "full" version would be used instead. Curre