search results

(...) uot; or something similar. To reduce these situations, we can use the "work on behalf of someone" function. I don’t know how many of you use it or if you have used this function to test what permissions a specific user has. We can take a user from each group created for permissions and ensure that the permissions received are correct. Additionally, this function can also be h (...)

(...) These small changes can be tracked via our changelog (available at the bottom of this page), which compiles a list of all modifications made to a major version over its lifecycle. Our latest major release is 2024.1 – [Whitepaper – Business overview]  WEBCON provides full technical support for our two latest major versions. Important: B (...)

(...) s of Portal. The implemented changes will enhance the accessibility and comprehension of Portal information for users of voice readers, such as Windows Narrator, VoiceOver, and TalkBack.   test ing compliance with WCAG There are a number of tools on the market that analyze websites' compliance with WCAG criteria and principles and scan them for accessibility issues. Among them are Lig (...)

(...) R1 and above, author: Krystyna Gawryał   Introduction WEBCON BPS is equipped with application export and import mechanisms, enabling users to create applications in one environment (DEV/test /PROD) and then deploy them in another. Until now, export and import operations have been initiated by administrators in WEBCON BPS Designer Studio, requiring user input to define the scope of the exp (...)

(...) f both components. In version 2024.1.1, the installation packages no longer include Microsoft Edge WebView2, which has resulted in a notable reduction in their size. Both components now utilize the latest versions of the runtime installed on the operating system. Please note that the "Microsoft Edge WebView2 runtime environment" of at least version 105.0.1343.22 is required for Designer Stud (...)

(...) use case is different you shuold use an SSL certificate. I'm using 'Let`s encrypt' service for my private environment. Using it with Windows IIS is pretty easy too as you will see in my latest blog post. It requires: An internet connection on the server where the SSL certificate should be downloaded Installation of two tools. A password. A script with 7 lines of code. (...)

(...) deploy the same process to multiple customers who require that these kind of things are documented. What would be the benefit of having an application: When something is automated, it can be test ed, and therefore there's lest to document. Depending on the setup you may have the same processes in multiple databases but these have different configuration. Business entities, connections, g (...)

(...) d of time, its status will change to Disabled.     Make sure that the Basic Authentication method is also set to Disabled. You may now close the IIS Manager.   test ing the functionality To test the functionality, the configuration steps mentioned above were carried out. The user then logged in to Portal on two different browsers (Microsoft Edge and Google Chr (...)

(...) d to easily scale a web application by starting more containers. In such a configuration, the Portal container is usually not made available directly to users, but requires a load balancer. In the test installation described here, such a configuration will be simulated by creating a container with a reverse proxy server for Portal. It can be any server with such feature. This article uses a Caddy s (...)

(...) nts/upload/; var sessionFinishPattern = //attachments/session/[a-f0-9-]+/finish/; // Verifică dacă URL-ul se potrivește cu pattern-urile specifice pentru atașamente if (uploadPattern.test (url) || sessionFinishPattern.test (url)) { // Apelează fetch-ul original și capturează răspunsul const response = await originalFetch(...args); // Folosește fetch-ul original! (...)

(...) These small changes can be tracked via our changelog (available at the bottom of this page), which compiles a list of all modifications made to a major version over its lifecycle. Our latest major release is 2025.1 – [Whitepaper – Business overview]  Important: Before upgrading from one complete version to another (eg from 2019 to 2025) c (...)

(...) de the production environment, and to ensure that the upgrade goes smoothly, it might be a good idea to perform what is called an environment mirroring, an operation in which the databases of the DEV/test environment are overwritten with those of the PROD environment. In this way, it is possible to upgrade the production databases in any other environment. The environment mirroring procedure is des (...)

(...) rmed and the problems encountered. Appropriate technical documentation (including instructions for installing and using the system, license agreements, etc.) is also added to the workflow. Step 5: test ing Description: The IT Specialist test s the accounting system. For example, they check whether all required components are installed, whether the data entered is secure, or whether the program conne (...)

(...) e same as in the OAuth2 control. With this solution, there is no need to reconfigure the connection to MS Graph from scratch. Fig. 11. Configuration of the Invoke REST Web service action To test the solution, the attachment is moved from the workflow instance to the indicated library. The attachment moved by the action will appear as added by a specific user, not the application. Therefore, (...)

Applies to version: 2025.1.x and above; author: Grzegorz Straś Related Documentation The 2 areas relevant to setting up this feature are the Visibility tab in the configuration of each form field, and the Security node in the global parameters, where the authorization methods are enabled. This article references only the minimal configuration required, but a full writeup of each page is

(...) d the .xml file containing the OCR results from being read and the action from being executed correctly. The problem with creating attachment databases has been fixed and no longer occurs in the latest versions of the system, while it may have occurred in versions older than 2023.1.3.289, 2024.1.1.130, and 2025.1.1.23. The problem has been fixed in version 2023.1.3.327 by adding a mechanism in (...)

(...) ons that will stop the timer-related actions) and Number of minutes to retry after error (defines the time after which the next timer execution will take place in case of an error). In addition, a test button has been provided so that you can check (via an additional Planned timer executions window) the scheduled dates on which the timer will be executed.   In the window, you can set (...)

(...) lters will be added to the widget, and the widget itself will be embedded in the dashboard.       Save your changes and exit the edit mode – now it's time to test the new widget! To do this, go to the widget, select any client name from the "Ordering party" filter list, and then choose Last 90 Days from the "Order date" filter. As you can s (...)

(...) ion parameters: Fig 2. Action configuration   The full script used in the example, along with a description of the variables, can be found in the next section of this article. To test the action, a workflow instance was created and two attachments were added to it. The action is available under the menu button, according to the configuration: Fig. 3. Example of a (...)

(...) BPS, we strive to provide our clients and partners with the best possible software. With each release, the platform is developed according to the highest industry standards and subjected to rigorous test ing procedures to ensure stability, reliability and security. Each major release of the platform (e.g. WEBCON BPS 2025) is supported for 12 months for bug/error fixes and improvement (...)