search results

(...) er, the disadvantage is much lower performance in advanced conditions, inability to join data, use union, and combine data from different content databases. By changing the source from BPS to SQL, User s lose the functionality of the link. Of course, we can achieve this in a different way, but it is not consistent, for example, with other pickers using a BPS source. Would it be possible to introd (...)

(...) Hello all, I have an item list with a editable column. This works if the item list does not have a lot of lines but if the item list has a long list of lines, this column becomes read-only and the User is only able to edit using the a pencil button that is displayed in each row. Is this a normal behavior? Thank you

(...) w=graph-rest-1.0&tabs=http Unfortunately, I have no idea how to implement the delegated permissions in WEBCON. Does WEBCON authentication have to be implemented via Azure AD (Entra ID) so that the User 's token is available? We are currently using our local AD. Does anyone have any experience here and can help me further? Many thanks in advance and best regards Marc

(...) item list, with 3 columns A, B(not important here) and C and I want to disable column C(data row), if column A(choice field) has value 1#Mother, for example. Even if it's a new row just added by the User at that moment, even if it's a row added previously by other User in another step.. I just simply want that column C to be "enabled" only for a certain condition. What I did, I followed the steps (...)

(...) Hello I have a problem when printing to Word. The Word form prints for my permissions, but for User s it does not print and the "unknown error" message appears. Maybe something with permissions but I don't know where to look. Can anyone help Thank you in advance

(...) this post right now because I just received again a "bug" description without a link or even an instance id. I have a good idea which process the description is related to and in which timeframe the User worked with it but this doesn't help me because the date: - I may not change the report views - The "recent activities" is to short. The search is currently an alternative for my current case bu (...)

(...) Hi, Currently we have 'Error occured' in the header of the validation message. This often results in unnecessary logging of error reports from User s who do not read the content, but only suggest that there is an error. Perhaps it would be a good idea to change the content of the header to something else that does not suggest an error, or allow it to be defined per action or globally? Regards.

(...) work in addition to, and independently of, other error handling actions added individually per automation. In many cases, this would help to solve many problems before they are even noticed by end User s, especially when actions are taken based on timeouts and other automated actions. Regards.

(...) Hi, I have a situation where multiple User s get assigned tasks on a certain path. The parallelism is set to Completion - All. It mostly work fine. But if certain User s complete their task before other User s do, the workflow goes into the next step, despite other User tasks not being completed. When I look at the element history, when other User s finish their task, "Completion - All" and their name (...)

(...) Hi Is there possible to set a rule or something else, so that you can only add one item in an item list? And if a User tries to "Add" a new item (2nd item) to set an alert ...? Thanks.

(...) Hi, in case you have choose fields, which reference information from another workflow you should prevent the User from entering special characters. Example: A subworkflow is linked to a parent workflow with a choose field and uses the Title field as the display name. If a User enters ; or # in the value of the field, this will break the choose field logic. The system will be interpreted as a (...)

(...) Dear WEBCON Team, I would like to propose a new feature to enhance social interactions within WEBCON BPS: the ability to tag other User s in the comments field. This would function similarly to tagging features on popular social media platforms, allowing User s to directly mention and engage with colleagues within the platform. Additionally, it would be highly beneficial to receive alerts when som (...)

(...) I need advice on how to get around this problem in the case of paths such as: Reject, Reverse, where these fields contain random data, e.g. set via OCR - without any intervention in the fields by the User . Regards

(...) with a link to the client. Clicking on the link signifies ACCEPTANCE. Such acceptance would trigger a transition path in WEBCON. How can this be done? Do you have any ideas? The client is an external User .

(...) ine again. Since the cycle is set to every 15 minutes, this error will likely recur after approximately 1.87 years. Question: Could you please confirm if the maximum execution count is 65,536? User VOICE: Could you suggest a solution to prevent this problem in the future? Thanks, Bjoern

(...) esponding dates, which is time-consuming and disrupts their workflow. Feature Request: ISO Week Number Display: Include ISO week numbers (ISO-8601) in the date picker interface. This will allow User s to quickly identify the week number alongside the date.

(...) ntraID as the only source of identity? I have some ideas for preparing some business processes in a cloud environment (Azure) that will never have access to classic domain controllers I need a full User database on EntraID (AAD). I tried with the free online instance of WebCon togeter with quite outdated manual. It requires restarting some services as soon as you add AAD authentication to BPM - I (...)

(...) sking it anyway ;-) Is there a way in Webcon BPS Portal to start a workflow with anonymous access (without authentication)? What we need here is some kind of public form for new registration of User s. This form also should have path authorization, to verify a new registered User (e.g. by sending a code via email). But I think this only User -related and only works with already registered User s. (...)

(...) Hello community! I'm facing a challenge for which i don't see any solutions, maybe You will be able to find it. Use case: User registers new form (parent), to that form, he needs to register additional forms (children). It's 2 level tree childrens are leafs, they can't be parents. On those children forms, there are validation rules, which depends on data from the parent form, and a path [Va (...)

(...) I am creating a workflow where I would like to give option [Send Back for LEGAL Check] on different steps (Screen shot added ). However, I want to create a restriction so on the legal check step User s can see only paths related to the step that it came from. Not all paths because that would be extremely confusing (screenshot of all paths added). So for clarification if the flow was send to "legal (...)