Daniel Krüger (Cosmo Consult)

Hi Andreia, I'm sorry but for some reason I don't receive any notifications and so I have to check any updates manually. If you don't delete rows, than it would be fine to just compare the number of rows. I haven't tested this in WEBCON but the below query could work when used in the OnEntry

I would also opt for the dictionary approach. The most important think here is to actually create a dictionary report and not a table report. Otherwise you could activate the export option but you wouldn't be able to us the import. Besides this the exported file differs also depending on the type.

Hi Maks, did you test this or did you run into issues with this? __ Also your environments DEV/PROD are now divergent - on DEV field is using WFD_AttText5, and on prod the same field uses WFD_AttText6. In case of any complex reports that require column names you'll have remember at every singl

Hi Lukasz, thanks for the update. :) For the moment I added an additional check, whether the group contains the expected members. This will of course fail, when someone modified the group via the BPS Portal instead of the process, but it made me realize, that I add some "maximum wait time" che

Hi everyone, I have a process which updates the group members. This is done in async mode because the synchronization takes a while. I'm trying to prevent updates by moving the workflow to a step which checks whether the synchronization is finished. As far as I found out so far a job get's ad

Hi Andreia, I sometimes face a situation, where I want to access the data via SQL and the values are not yet written / available for different reasons. In these cases I move those "read" actions from the path to the OnEntry and everything works fine. I'm not sure whether this would apply in

Hi, I would implement it in another way. As far as I understand it, this would always set a technical field which in turn invokes the menu action. This would always save the instance, which may not be so good for the use experience. I see two options, one with a technical field as suggested a

Thanks, I just noticed it myself. :) Unfortunately I don't receive any notifications, also everything is activated. :(

Hi Andreia, the issue is, that the field is marked as technical. If a field is a technical field, it is not part of the DOM and therefore doesn't exist for the browser. Therefore, setting an HTML field to technical makes no sense. :) Best regards, Daniel

Hi Andreia, the way Jack mentioned is the correct way. I prefer another approach though. The reason for this is simply, because I hate changing anything in the steps, because it will be forgotten. I use an HTML field which hides the 'Add row' button with CSS for the item list. This field is th

Hi, this may sound strange, but so was the reason, why I'm proposing this. My suggestion is that the expression editor for a SQL command inserts the instance id variable in a way: Currently it is inserted as: {WFD_ID} My suggestion is that it is inserted within single quotes: '{WFD_ID}' T

Hi, the only way to "change" it would be to find an English language code which uses another starting date of the week. For example, the official suggestion to change the English date format from MM/DD/YYYY to DD/MM/YYYY is to change from en-us to en-gb. Best regards, Daniel

Hi, in my opinion it would be a really helpful, when the 'user privileges' tab on the process is displayed in red if any form type privileges are defined. I would use the color red as it's used in other cases, where the inheritance is broken like with forms.. Even so this is not strictly inher

Hi Joanna, I do have a slight idea what may happen, but it’s not worth writing about it. What I would do is to start the instance with a path that does nothing at all. The start step has a timeout which would then trigger the actual path. This way the workflow is saved and you will have all th

In case the attribute(field) is enough, you could also display it when something was changed. You can use the advanced configuration of the item list to show the field which could be hidden on form load. Best regards, Daniel

Hi Radel, I’m also not sure in which context this is necessary. If they leave the element they should get the message from Jack. This should apply also if the tab is closed. The only situation I could think of, if the users leave the tab open in the background. Then you could get into a si

Hi Andreia, the fields I'm using are just used to demonstrate the difference between the "Last comment" and the business rule for getting the current comment. You would simply use the business rule in the condition of the If operator. It would be up to you where you use this. It could be ge

I didn't think of this option, but that's how ideas are born. :) Depending on your version and whether you can execute SDKs you could download this: 2021 https://github.com/Daniel-Krueger/webcon_cclsactions/releases/tag/0.1 2022 https://github.com/Daniel-Krueger/webcon_cclsactions/releases/

Hi Wojtek, would it be an option to simply switch the names of the form types, so that the Ids could be kept and only configurations need /reports would need to be changed. This way you wouldn't need to update the instances. If this isn't an option there's no way around testing even if someone

Hi Andreia, I also don't fully understand your request. Based on what I understand I can tell you the following: - Timeouts are only created / deactivated when an path transition happens. Saving an workflow instance or saving a comment in the view mode won't create a new timeout. - Even if yo