WELCOME TO THE COMMUNITY
find what you are looking for or ask a new question
Home > Forum > Latest posts

latest posts

MVP
In reply to: Franek

I have tested both web services in Soap UI, and they work with no issues.

The web services for which I cannot import the WSDL use SOAP 1.1, while the web service with the following error uses SOAP 1.2

Okay so if it works through SOAP UI, then i'd look for any mismatches in Types interpreted by Webcon, vs WSDL specification.

I remember that i had to change returned format from my SOAP api, so webcon could use it. Unfortunatelly this isn't an option here, but checking the types might let us know if it something we can or can't fix.

When trying to log in via AAD I get an error:

{
"type": "Exception",
"message": "Failed with an unknown exception",
"errorGuid": "99f68f89-25f2-4839-a6d0-1f93991063df",
"stacktrace": "",
"innerError": null
}

In Entra Microsoft I see information about the Application logging in to Entra but instead of a response in Entra I see this error - What does it mean and why do I not have a response from Entry about successful or unsuccessful login ?

MVP
In reply to: Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania

I would also add to this the new possibilities for customizing the menu and the dashboard filters. Although the new way, from a dev perspective, may seem a little more confusing at first, it now allows for a much more intuitive and friendly UI/UX.

The new functionalities have added some complexity for the developers but much more flexibility for the customer's needs. It's way easier as a dev to screw it up, but if done properly the customer will end up with better results. We need to revise our internal development processes and practices now, but if we can offer more value, we don't mind.

@Adam
The elements you mentioned have "always" been there. I mention this just in case you need to use them in an older version. ;)


Yes the new options we have to define in the navigation is really great.
I added my first idea for "migrating" to the new one. Maybe we can share our ideas regarding a good "default" navigation structure. As Razvan mentioned, we need to define new guidelines now and a joint effort may help everyone.
Regarding the navigation grid: There's currently an issue with the translation, old ones may get lost, if you update the translation of a single element.

I also like the the option to define multilingual texts on the dashboards. Another workaround we can now scrap. :)

MVP
In reply to: Franek

I have encountered another issue with SOAP web services. Does anyone know what this error might mean?

in Polish is "Typ zawartości text/xml; charset=utf-8 nie został obsłużony przez usługę http://adres usługi. Powiązania klienta i serwera mogą się nie zgadzać."

Sorry for no response on previous topic, lately I'm having less time for forum that I'd like to :)

Based on the message i'd assume that:
a) webcon parses the wsdl incorrectly, and passes data in other format than SOAP expects
b) there is a bug in the wsdl, which incorrectly describes how the data should be handled

I'd try to use some external SOAP testing tool, like Postman/Insomnia to check if requests work using those.

MVP
In reply to: Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania

I would also add to this the new possibilities for customizing the menu and the dashboard filters. Although the new way, from a dev perspective, may seem a little more confusing at first, it now allows for a much more intuitive and friendly UI/UX.

The new functionalities have added some complexity for the developers but much more flexibility for the customer's needs. It's way easier as a dev to screw it up, but if done properly the customer will end up with better results. We need to revise our internal development processes and practices now, but if we can offer more value, we don't mind.

I have to agree that Dashboard level filters are something that i've been really missing (I've some experience with Tableau where it is an obvious feature).
It closes the gap to BI system, and allows to achieve more in WEBCON itself which is great for smaller companies not having BI tools.

On the UI change offtopic though - I get why many people might be upset about it, especially when applications have a lot of UI customizations.
This is why i always try to avoid it as much as possible - it's the platform that decides how things should look, we are paying for not having to deal with it.
UI / UX designers should deal with it, and delivering Fluent 2 designed by Microsoft is from my perspective really smart, as it aligns perfectly with Windows 11 UI, and all the Office apps stack which is still default in most corporations.