Hi Adam,
Could you provide screenshot of the error?
It would help to know where the error occurs :)
Hi Adam,
Could you provide screenshot of the error?
It would help to know where the error occurs :)
Hello, I have element in archive database, when I click admin I show error "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'showTitle')". How it fix?
Hi,
could you copy the configuration of the timeout?
If the timeout executes a path, the insert condition is evaluated again. If this is false then the timeout should no longer be created and once all timeouts are removed from the database, you should be able to remove it from Designer Studio.
Best regards,
Daniel
Right now it's totaly empty.
Type: Do action
SQL - empty
Daily, 90 days inteval, execute once.
I've tried give SQL wich is always wrong 1=0, but it's still going to the list of timeouts
Hi,
I have to admit, I have never seen the benefit of the filter condition and always applied the filter in the SQL statement itself. So, I'm not sure whether there can be an actual issue with business rules and parameters in this action.
Besides this, did you activate the diagnostic mode and checked the executed SQL statements?
Best regards,
Daniel
Hi,
could you copy the configuration of the timeout?
If the timeout executes a path, the insert condition is evaluated again. If this is false then the timeout should no longer be created and once all timeouts are removed from the database, you should be able to remove it from Designer Studio.
Best regards,
Daniel
Hello,
I'm trying to import user data from the import WF (1) into the employee WF (2) and route based on whether the user has an Active Directory account.
Depending on whether the user has an Active Directory user or not, the user should either be sent to the blue path or to the purple path in WF (2).
The issue is that the business rule in the 'Start a Sub Workflow (SQL)' actions, which checks if someone has an AD user or not, isn't working when I pass parameters like ##Vorname## [engl. Firstname] and ##Zuname## [engl. Surname] (which turns into {Vorname} & {Zuname}).
The filter works with hardcoded names but fails with passed parameters.
Any ideas on what I'm doing wrong or how to fix it? Is there a better approach?
I have timeout that is no longer needed. I want to delete it.
But aplication runs constantly and in step with timeout there always will be elements.
How to get rid of this timeout. I've tried setting is to always false, but it's still trigered and goes to list.
I have few of them on diffrent steps and they total 10k elements in timeout list.
Hi Maks,
did you test this or did you run into issues with this?
__
Also your environments DEV/PROD are now divergent - on DEV field is using WFD_AttText5, and on prod the same field uses WFD_AttText6.
In case of any complex reports that require column names you'll have remember at every single update, that you have to manually update that report. Not cool :)
__
I'm quite sure that they will both have the same column name.
@S Blue
Except this example I can confirm Maks response.
If you import a new version to a target environment or database in this regard, every element in a process is removed in the target environment if it's GUID does not exist in the import package.
There's maybe on exception. If a workflow instance is in a step which was deleted in a new version, there's either an error, or the the step remains in the system. I'm not to sure about it.
I have in mind that you can delete steps, if no workflow instance is currently assigned to it, but I'm not sure. The history would look strange. :)
Best regards,
Daniel
That's an issue we've faced on our environments in one application, I'll try to replicate it though and will update with results :)
Hi Mario,
I have never faced a similar use case, the only 100% solution would be to:
- Create the tasks with an action
- Set completion mode of the path to "any" and not parallel
- Move the workflow to a flow control, which verifies the requirements
- If the requirements are not met, move back to the previous step and create the missing tasks.
If you have a version, where assignments to groups are not resolved to individuals, you may have another option.
https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2024R1/Studio/Process/Process_Configuration/Process_Settings#assign-tasks-for-groups-directly-to-group-members
That would be to set the task completion to "wait for required tasks" and use "Fixed number".
I haven't used this configuration before, but it may work if you have always three tasks. I'm also wondering what will happen if an individual is also a part of the group. In this case both tasks may get completed.
Best regards,
Daniel
I have a workflow with a step that serves as an approval process. I assign one group and two individuals to this task. My goal is for both individuals to click confirm in this step, and only one person from the group (which contains several people) needs to do so. To summarize, I need to write the logic in a way that differentiates between the assigned individuals and the group, so that only one person from the group needs to confirm. I hope I have explained this clearly enough.
Thank you for your help!