Yes, the licenses are activated correctly.
Have you found solution? I have exactly this same error on Freemium. And the licence is activated.
Yes, the licenses are activated correctly.
Have you found solution? I have exactly this same error on Freemium. And the licence is activated.
Hi,
I don't really understand what you want to achieve.
- You get x invoices , number, vendor, date
- Each invoice has y lines, article, price quantity
Do you have one process with two item list, one for the invoice and one for the invoice lines or do you want to create one workflow instance for each invoice and populate an item list with the invoice lines?
Without knowing the whole use case, I would assume that the later would be better, for any kind of approval workflow or similar.
Even if I'm wrong and you want to populate two item lists in one workflow instance, I don't see the issue. I would:
- Retrieve all invoices
- Foreach invoice
-- Add a row to the first item list
-- Fetch the invoice lines
-- Add rows to the second item list with the invoice lines and add a column to store the the invoice number as a reference.
I created an SDK action some years ago to populate an item list from an XML file. Maybe this could be a good starting point for you.
Code:
https://github.com/Daniel-Krueger/webcon_xmlToItemList/blob/main/CC_XmlToItemList/XMLtoItemList.cs
Blog post
https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2021/custom-action-xml-to-item-list
Best regards,
Daniel
Hi,
I have a process that works with invoices. Each invoice contains a variable number of line items (name, price, VAT, etc.). Using an SDK, I’m retrieving these invoices from an API. Since the number of invoices and the number of line items per invoice can vary, how should I configure the SDK so that each line item is correctly mapped to a item list in the process? Is there a specific mapping method for handling a dynamic number of invoice items?
Thanks!
Hi Daniel,
What about this approach:
- First, identify all workflow instances where the affected users still have "open tasks".
- Then finish those tasks programmatically, e.g. via REST API:
Community post: “The finish all users tasks option” - https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/the-finish-all-users-tasks-option/24/3
REST endpoint: POST /api/data/v7.0/db/{dbId}/elements/{id}/admin/tasks/finishall
Docs: REST API – finish all tasks - https://developer.webcon.com/2026/resources/rest_api7.0/index.html#tag/PublicApiElements/paths/~1api~1data~1v7.0~1db~1%7BdbId%7D~1elements~1%7Bid%7D~1admin~1tasks~1finishall/post
-After that, if necessary, adjust permissions so that users only have Read access.
Best regards
Maryna
Hi Maryna,
I wasn't aware that this endpoint exists.
In the end we decided to modify the privileges on database level directly. But we saved the original permissions to an Excel file before, so that we could revert the changes.
Hm, maybe I should create a new user voice to mark an application / process as readonly.
Best regards,
Daniel
Hello,
while downloading emails, the following message appears:
Could not download attachments. Skipping e-mail: AU2601705
Microsoft.Exchange.WebServices.Data.ServiceVersionException: The property Mentions is valid only for Exchange Exchange2015 or later versions.
In the HotMailBox configuration, there's no option to specify a dedicated configuration for Exchange On-premises. There's only an option for MS Exchange 2013/2016/2019.
I use MS Exchange in version 2019
Hi Daniel,
What about this approach:
- First, identify all workflow instances where the affected users still have "open tasks".
- Then finish those tasks programmatically, e.g. via REST API:
Community post: “The finish all users tasks option” - https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/the-finish-all-users-tasks-option/24/3
REST endpoint: POST /api/data/v7.0/db/{dbId}/elements/{id}/admin/tasks/finishall
Docs: REST API – finish all tasks - https://developer.webcon.com/2026/resources/rest_api7.0/index.html#tag/PublicApiElements/paths/~1api~1data~1v7.0~1db~1%7BdbId%7D~1elements~1%7Bid%7D~1admin~1tasks~1finishall/post
-After that, if necessary, adjust permissions so that users only have Read access.
Best regards
Maryna
Hi Daniel,
Do you think this could help you?
Designer Studio > Administration Tools > Permission Migration
Hi Martin,
the permission migration isn't really an option. In the worst case, the user would no longer be able to access the workflow instance.
Best regards,
Daniel
Hi Daniel,
Do you think this could help you?
Designer Studio > Administration Tools > Permission Migration
Hi,
You can use the "Change values of multiple fields" action using the same data source you used in the autocomplete file (and specify the fields you want to complete).
https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2025R1/Studio/Action/Form/Action_ChangeManyValues
I was searching for an option where i do not have do it in a seperate action. Does someone know if this will be a feature thats automatically changes the coressponding fields when changing the value of the autocomplete via an action?
WEBCON BPS Designer Studio -> System Settings ->Authentication providers -> OpenID Connect -> your OpenId provider -> Logout redirect URL.
Your provider must have a logout page to do so.
Hi Paweł
have there been any changes since.
we have currenty a project concerning Webcon as embeded on mobile devices using fixed browser tab. feedback will be much appraciated